|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
While taking the 300CD in for
servicing at my independent mechanic, I noticed that one of the guys (Mr. Sing, a Vietnamese who does incredible diagnoses by EAR)was working on an ML, which I have heard have LOTS of problems.
I asked Mr. Sing if the MLs were bad cars. "Not for us!" was his response. The CD got its detailed "shave, shine and haircut" for under $100. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I have heard in some quarters that ML= Jeep. Take that any way you like.
__________________
Nate Stanley (Currently Benzless) 1985 F-250 6.9l 170K 2009 SCION XB 36.5K 2003 LS430 78K 2012 Kubota B 2320 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Hey!!
Easy on the jeeps! Not even including the contribution during WWII, jeeps are probably one of the few american vehicles to hold up like these MB's. Maybe you meant Chrysler=ML=Jeep. Granted no 'real' jeeps were built after 1986 when Chrysler took over. ML= TJ or YJ I would accept (hence the new Liberty), but easy on the CJ's and earlier. Mine has over 200,000 miles on it ( almost no highway and a lot of off-road) and still goes strong and looks good. I'll take on an ML any day off-road. God help us if Chrysler does to MB what it did to Jeep. In my opinion, buying a truck from a passenger car company isn't so smart anyway. It's like complaining that the caviar at the HessMart isn't salty enough. BTW, as a result of the Daimler-Chrysler arrangement, the Jeep Liberty will soon be available with a 4.0L diesel. That will be a great truck.
__________________
1982 Mercedes-Benz 300CD 1982 Mercedes-Benz 240D - stick |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Aren't all of the ML's made in the USA with alot of the parts made in mexico?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|