PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Diesel Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Zero degrees timing chain stretch (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=62001)

md21722 04-11-2003 11:21 AM

Zero degrees timing chain stretch
 
Hi all,

My '87 300D with 279Kmi (94Kmi on the timing chain) has NO timing chain stretch :) The PO original chain was replaced as PM by the previous owner the week I bought the car. I've run synthetics the entire time mostly Delvac 1 or Mobil 1 with oil changes between 6500-9500 miles and the engine runs very strong. On other sites its been suggested that the use of synthetic oil seems to eliminate timing chain stretch and frequent oil changes with good mineral oil can come close to the same.

Regards,

LarryBible 04-11-2003 11:58 AM

That's exactly right. I ran my original 240D engine 380,000 miles with religious 3,000 mile oil change interval using Delo 400. Synthetic should allow you to extend the intervasl some as long as the engine is not otherwise worn allowing excessive fuel or combustion by-products into the oil.

Have a great day,

DieselAddict 04-11-2003 12:31 PM

Larry, are you saying you ran 380K miles on the same chain? If so that's quite amazing.

My car has 200K+ miles and a mechanic told me last year the chain is not stretched. He didn't say 0 degrees, but only that it is not stretched. I think I believe him.

md21722 04-11-2003 12:36 PM

Larry,

I was hoping you'd chime in :) What happened at 380,000 miles? Are you on the original chain or how much was it stretched when it was changed?

The point here is that adhering to a change interval that's best for your engine can save maintenance in the long run - like changing the timing chain. For MY driving habits and engine, changing synthetic oil every 6500-9500 miles works. I've tested it with oil analysis and engine condition confirms it. For others, mineral oil changes will work better. In my opinion, changing oil at the "right time" - either synthetic or mineral - is very important. More important than what kind of oil you use.

Regards,

md21722 04-11-2003 12:46 PM

DieselAddict,

Has your mechanic ever measured the chain stretch? Either with a dial indicator or lining up the marks on the cam and tower? Some mechanics will say that chains don't stretch or that it doesn't matter - that's completely false!

My '87 300D spare engine has 3-4 degrees at 175Kmi and I've heard of some 617 engines with as much as 17 degrees of stretch!! The chains DO stretch if the engine has not been well cared for (changing the oil).

Regards,

turbodiesel 04-11-2003 01:00 PM

My 603 had 13 degrees at 270,000 miles. Needless to say it got replaced along with the tensioner.

LarryBible 04-11-2003 02:26 PM

The 380,000 mile mark on the old 240D was a long time ago. I had checked the chain not too long before the engine came apart and the marks still perfectly aligned. I did not use a dial indicator. Once the marks no longer align, that is the time to get more precise with the dial indicator.

The rear seal failed just all of a sudden. I was screaming along in the heat of the summer on an Interstate. I rolled in to get fuel, swung around to turn the car around in a truck stop. I immediately got out and noticed a trail of oil where I had just turned around. I opened the hood and could see a puddle of oil probably 3 inches in diameter. The car could not have been setting there 60 seconds at that point.

Before this stop, it had NEVER leaked a drop of oil anywhere. I got a gallon of Delo at that truck stop and went on the rest of the trip which was probably about 500 miles before I made it back home. I used up the gallon of oil to make that 500 miles.

The engine had developed a noise that I thought was strange. When the motor came apart, it had a failed ring land on one of the pistons that would have given some catastrophic problems at one point had it not come apart. Also it was discovered that (big suprise) the rope seal was no longer touching the crankshaft.

This was the original chain.

The cause of chain "stretch" is particulate matter from less than frequent oil changes. This particulate matter over time wears the rollers and pins. Think about it, if each roller/pin were to wear one ten thousandth of an inch, you are talking several thousandths of overall chain "stretch."

Changing a chain for preventive maintenance reasons does not in itself prevent chain failure. These chains typically don't fail, a rail breaks or something else that CAUSES the chain to break. If the chain is stretched then, of course, you need to offset a sprocket or replace the chain in order to have proper timing.

Closely inspect the chain rails, tensioner and all associated timing chain components when checking the chain.

Have a great day,
Change oil hot and change oil often!

sixto 04-11-2003 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbodiesel
My 603 had 13 degrees at 270,000 miles. Needless to say it got replaced along with the tensioner.
How close did you come to hitting TDC at the crank and cam with the new chain?

In my SDL, I can't do better than 4 crank degrees either way with a new head and new chain. I don't know if the marker is properly aligned since I don't have a dial gauge. I tried 4-BTDC and now and 4-ATDC. Can't tell the difference.

Thanks,
Sixto
91 300SE
87 300SDL
83 300SD

joshhol 04-11-2003 04:04 PM

Is it possible to measure a chains length after it has been pulled from an engine to see if its worn?
For OM617 chain with 280,000miles. My mechanic replaced it but didn't measure the stretch in the right way so I have no Idea if it was really worn. The car has always had oil changes done in a timely manner.

DieselAddict 04-11-2003 05:19 PM

md21722, I assume my mechanic measured the chain stretch one way or another as I specifically asked him to inspect it while he had the cover off to do valve adjustment. I don't think he dismissed chain stretch as a possibility. Besides he listed a bunch of other things on my car that he recommended replacing so I believe if he lied to me it was about what needed to be done, not what didn't need to be done.

turbodiesel 04-11-2003 05:20 PM

We didn't check it again after the new chain went in, I couldn't tell you, sixto.

Stevo 04-13-2003 11:04 AM

"Is it possible to measure a chains length after it has been pulled from an engine to see if its worn?"

I was wondering that same thing. It seems to me I saw someplace where a chain was held "sideways" and the arc measured to determine wear. I bought a 616 engine off eBay and the chain shows very little stretch via timing & cam marks but I would like to check it out better.
I will post this question later on into the project if no one reading this thread knows.

JimSmith 04-13-2003 11:16 AM

All this discussion of chain stretching confuses me. If the links on the sides don't actually get longer, I fail to see how the chain gets longer. If the rollers and pins wear the space between them changes, but this is not cumulative. The center of each pin stays in the same relative location that it was when the chain was new. And how does oil changing affect the stretching of the links?

If the chain fit the to sprocket gets sloppy, and the sprocket is wearing and getting smaller in diameter where the chain engages the teeth, then I think I can understand how the chain would seem to have gained and "apparent" length. Otherwise I am not able to see how the chain gets longer. Jim

md21722 04-13-2003 11:48 AM

Dirty oil wears the chain faster. The parts that hold the chain together get looser and "become stretched" because they don't fit as tight together anymore.

P.E.Haiges 04-13-2003 12:41 PM

Jim Smith,

Wear of the pins and holes is certainly cumuilative although chain stretch is a bad description, better is chain elongation.

If each pin and each pin hole were to wear .001 inch where they touch each other, chain each link would be offset by .002 inch from new. Thus the overall measured length will be the original chain length plus .002 inch times the number of links.

If you compared a new chain to a worn one, you would see a definite difference in length. Also the arc of a worn chain would be greater due to the "slop" between the pins and holes.

P E H

gsxr 04-13-2003 05:06 PM

TD,

At 13 degrees stretch you would have had valves smacking pistons. I think someone made a typo somewhere. More typical is 3 degrees. Mercedes recommends replacement on OM602/603 engines when stretch exceeds 4 degrees. They also say that 1 degree is normal after ~20kmi. It's all in the manual, interesting bathroom reading... :D :D

Brian, I think the synthetic is what kept stretch so low. I question whether dino changed every 3k would provide identical results. Dino changed less often definitely makes for faster chain wear though...

Regards,

LarryBible 04-13-2003 05:31 PM

gsxr,

The REASON that dino oil, probably not just any old dino oil, can prevent chain stretch with thorough drain and filter change at 3,000 mile intervals is that the chain wear is caused by microscopic particulate in the oil. By draining often, you keep this particulate to a minimum, thus keeping chain wear at an absolute minimum.

In fact, using synthetic and changing at longer intervals could very well allow more chain wear than dino oil changed frequently. This could possibly happen because of the microscopic particulate that accumulates in the oil over time. The ultimate would be synthetic changed frequently, but not very many folks can afford that.

I'm not sure about your comment regarding your "questioning" whether or not dino oil changed at 3,000 mile intervals would provide identical results. Are you trying to say that you don't BELIEVE that my chain went 380,000 miles with no apparent stretch?

Have a great day,

gsxr 04-13-2003 05:42 PM

So you bought that 240D brand new, it had no stretch at 380k, and currently has 533k on it...? Wow. And oddly enough extending synthetic drain intervals seems to have no detrimental effect on chain life. Isn't that what the filter is for? The only thing that should stay in the oil is soot, where it's suspended (assuming you change before hitting the 3-4% suspension limit for most diesel oils.)

md21722 04-13-2003 11:14 PM

If synthetic or mineral oil is used the oil still needs to be changed - and at the right time! Determining the "right time" can be difficult. For mineral oil 2500-3000 miles seems to offer the best protection. For synthetics, longer drains are often possible. There is NO evidence that changing synthetic oil less frequently than mineral oil is bad. The fact that my chain when 94Kmi without stretching is just more evidence this is true. For 603 engines and other engines with hydraulic lifters, there is evidence that synthetic oil will quieten noisy lifters. I determined that SOOT is the most critical contaminant in diesel oil - at least for my purposes. Accepted limit is 3% but I like to keep mine closer to 2%. That translates into 6500-9500 mile intervals for my car and that's how often I change the oil. I go this route because at this rate I change the oil every 3-7 weeks instead of every 2500 miles (1.5-4 weeks) with mineral.

LarryBible 04-14-2003 07:12 AM

380,000 is when the engine had to come apart for other reasons. The car did not go 533,000 on the same engine without being rebuilt. The marks still aligned at 380,000 miles. This engine ran about 95% highway miles and oil and filter were changed religiously at 3,000 mile intervals. No I did not buy the car new. It had 17,000 miles when I bought it, I really don't think it had the chain replaced before I got it.

An oil filter will not trap the microscopic particles that I'm talking about. That's why they're considered microscopic. Draining the oil often is the ONLY way to keep them out.

Synthetic does indeed offer more LUBRICATION protection than dino oil. We all know that. Regardless of what oil you use, the microscopic particulate will accumulate and is not trapped by the oil filter.

Have a great day,
Change oil hot and change oil often!

md21722 04-14-2003 09:00 AM

Its true that the oil filter does not trap ' microscopic' particles. They float around in the oil. Most of what an oil filter catches is the goop that forms when mineral oil is run too long. However, synthetic oil doesn't create this goop in the same way. There is NO evidence that suggests that synthetic oil needs to be changed as often as mineral oil for the purposes of engine longevity.

JimSmith 04-14-2003 11:39 AM

PEH,

Thanks for setting me straight on the chain wear issue. I was imagining the wear occured at the interface between the sprocket teeth and the chain, which is apparently not a concern. I will try harder not to step on my, err... chain, in the future. Jim

gsxr 04-14-2003 12:56 PM

The sprockets do wear out but this is visible, no measurement required. They don't often require replacement before an engine rebuild though.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website