![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
126 chassis "leans" the tires into the turn ( all kind of benefits)
Does the 124 chassis lean the tires into the turnthe same way? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Yup. Most Mercedes do that, it's part of the reason they all have such a tight turning radius. It's a little hard on tires if you do a lot of parking-lot manuevers but I'll happily accept that little quirk...
![]()
__________________
Check out my website photos, documents, and movies! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
You're seeing the 9-10 degrees of Caster that Mercedes uses on these cars.
__________________
Brian Toscano |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Always wondered about that too. Whats a "normal" caster angle on other cars?
__________________
past MB rides: '68 220D '68 220D(another one) '67 230 '84 SD Current rides: '06 Lexus RX330 '93 Ford F-250 '96 Corvette '99 Polaris 700 RMK sled 2011 Polaris Assault '86 Yamaha TT350(good 'ol thumper) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Is that why the tires look all screwy when I park with the wheels turned sharply?
I was hoping this was the reason and not that there was something wrong. It doesn't really look good, but I do appreciate that tight turning radius on a larger car like that.
__________________
'78 240D |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Caster on American cars varies from 0 to about 8 degrees, I think (may be more on more modern designs). The lean on turning is also kingpin inclination (the "tilt" of the steering knuckle pivot inward at the top --- no one actually used kingpins except Ford on the Twin I-beam truck suspension after 1972).
This is a good thing -- as the body rolls, the tire patch stays flat on the pavement. They do look a bit funky, though, af full turn. Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles 1988 300E 200,012 1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles 1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000 1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs! |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|