1990 190E 3.2 performance mods:

-Engine swap with M104 from a 1995 E320 w/ 722.4 auto tranny
-Remus Muffler
-High Temp. paint on the spark plug cover
-Hasn't been washed since August (drag co-efficiant went up by 6.8 lol)
-3.27:1 diff. ratio

1995 C36 performance mods:

-Full 3" exhaust, mandrel bent, jet hotted, ceramic coated, hi-flow cat, magnaflow muffler (estimated 285+hp)
-Has been in rain once... (that makes it faster!)
-2.85:1 diff. ratio

Good race! I'm sure the 190 could have gotten into the 14's at 2000 ft altitude, but he was probably nervous cause it was his first time at a track so he wasn't doing a good job with his driving skillz Here is the jist of the run. The posted track time INCLUDES the minusing of the reaction time. So non the less, the posted times are of the car's 1/4 no matter if they started differently. The person in the 190's reation time was .128 and the guy in the C36 was .666 (don't ask). Some people say "Wow, bad driver", I agree, for the person in the 190, VERY BAD DRIVER (he sucks). C36 driver, very skilled, he's probably a certified PLAYA cause he gots a lot of skill! He was raised around Mercedes, he wasn't letting off the throttle. Any ways... Enough talk for me. I don't know why it's so unbelievable! Every one is trying to find logical reasons and explinations why it turned out the way it did... Why can't the reason just be that the car is somewhat fast in the 1/4?!

http://www.wallaceracing.com/altitudecorrection.htm for sea level speeds and track ET corrections

http://190rev.vsf88.com/upload/pix/190E/E32vsC36.wmv THE VIDEO....

__________________
Coming soon... TurboBenz190E 3.2! 6.5lbs of boost and good to fly!
http://www.500ecstasy.com/images/Rol.../signature.jpg