PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The EU sits on its hands to stop Genocide. (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=168916)

MedMech 10-29-2006 10:51 AM

The EU sits on its hands to stop Genocide.
 
September 10, 2006



Rescue Darfur Now

By John McCain and Bob Dole

In 1995, the writing was on the wall. The conflict in Bosnia was escalating. Tens of thousands of civilians had been driven from their homes and were trapped in places the United Nations had designated as "safe areas," including Srebrenica. Only a few hundred poorly equipped U.N. peacekeepers stood between those civilians and Bosnian Serb forces. The Serbs had signaled their defiance of the United Nations, their disdain for diplomatic overtures and their determination to advance on the safe areas and finish the job of ethnic cleansing in Bosnia. All the makings of a massacre were present, and, before the eyes of the world, that is what unfolded. Eight thousand Bosnian Muslims were systematically killed at Srebrenica, and history has judged severely those policymakers who failed to heed the warning signs of mass murder.

As advocates of military action in Bosnia, we will never forget those terrible days. We remember that when the United States and its allies did finally act, military intervention saved countless lives. And all of us pledged anew that, should such a situation again unfold, we would do things very differently.

Today, the Darfur region of Sudan faces its own Srebrenica moment.

The scale of human destruction thus far in Sudan has been staggering. Already, more than 200,000 civilians have been killed, with perhaps 2.5 million forced into squalid camps. This catastrophe is the result of a directed slaughter perpetrated by the Sudanese government and allied Janjaweed militias.

Faced with its moral responsibility to act, the U.N. Security Council has adopted a resolution that would replace a courageous but inadequate African Union force with a much larger U.N. force empowered to protect civilians. Last week, the Sudanese government not only rejected the resolution but demanded that the African Union withdraw from the country, leaving civilians vulnerable. Meanwhile, government forces have launched a major offensive in Darfur to finish off any rebel forces there, pushing tens of thousands more civilians into the camps.

As with Srebrenica in 1995, the potential for further mass killing in Darfur today is plain for all to see. All the warnings have been issued, including one from the United Nations that the coming weeks may see "a man-made catastrophe of an unprecedented scale." What remains unclear is only whether the world has the will to impose an outcome on Sudan different from that which unfolded so tragically in Bosnia. Make no mistake: At some point we will step in to help victims in Darfur and police an eventual settlement. The question is whether the United States and other nations will act now to prevent a tragedy, or merely express sorrow and act later to deal with its aftermath.

Urgent action is required in the coming hours and days.

First, the United States should reject out of hand Khartoum's demand that the African Union force leave and should insist that it stay, with broad international support, until the introduction of a robust U.N. force in accordance with Security Council Resolution 1706.

Second, the United States should call on the European Union to impose financial sanctions against the Sudanese leadership and to pursue the immediate imposition of similar sanctions by the U.N. Security Council.

Third, NATO should immediately establish and enforce a no-fly zone over Darfur to ensure that Khartoum ends its offensive military flights and bombing raids, as the Security Council has already demanded.

Fourth, the United States should intensify efforts to persuade U.N. members to commit troops and funds for the U.N. force in Darfur, and it should develop plans for U.S. logistical support. The administration should push the United Nations to draw up firm plans for the entrance of a robust force into Darfur and contingency plans for the force to enter without Sudanese consent.

Fifth, U.S. and allied intelligence assets, including satellite technology, should be dedicated to record any atrocities that occur in Darfur so that future prosecutions can take place. We should publicly remind Khartoum that the International Criminal Court has jurisdiction to prosecute war crimes in Darfur and that Sudanese leaders will be held personally accountable for attacks on civilians.

Finally, the United States should increase pressure on countries friendly to Khartoum—and particularly our allies in the Arab League—to abandon their support for Sudan's refusal to accept the U.N. force.

Some of these steps would be dramatic and difficult. But the circumstances imposed on the people of Darfur are likewise dramatic and difficult. And so would be the consequences of inaction: a humanitarian disaster that the world will in any case have to address; a massive and possibly permanent population of refugees dependent on international support; a conflict spreading to neighboring countries with prospects for settlement even more remote; and a permanent stain on our conscience.

Throughout the world, people of conscience were shocked by and ashamed of our failure to stop the genocide in Bosnia and Rwanda. We must not repeat these mistakes. In Darfur, the moment of truth is now.

John McCain is a U.S. senator from Arizona and Bob Dole was a longtime senator from Kansas and the 1996 Republican presidential nominee.



Copyright 2006

The Washington Post Company

MedMech 10-29-2006 11:24 AM

I bet if the Dakar Rally were in jeopardy they would care.

Botnst 10-29-2006 12:35 PM

It's Bush's fault that the Darfurians (Darfurites? Darfonians?) are dying.

MedMech 10-29-2006 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1316329)
It's Bush's fault that the Darfurians (Darfurites? Darfonians?) are dying.

Guess who is elling the arms to the bad guys.

Hint: Cone heads

cmac2012 10-29-2006 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Botnst (Post 1316329)
It's Bush's fault that the Darfurians (Darfurites? Darfonians?) are dying.

Straw man alert.

Botnst 10-29-2006 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmac2012 (Post 1316346)
Straw man alert.

Duh.

It's a pre-emptive strawman fishing for proto-red herrings.

B

t walgamuth 10-29-2006 07:47 PM

the darfurians are from star trek, right?

i will ask mrs. w.

she loves that sci-fi crap.

(dont bother to try to blackmail me with this statement,she knows how i feel.)

tom w

Vronsky 10-30-2006 05:23 AM

I fail to notice in the article what the EU is supposed to do.
Senator McCain does mention five steps the US should do however.
Did you read this article yourself at all?

aklim 10-30-2006 09:14 AM

How is this our affair? What's in it for us?

Hatterasguy 10-30-2006 01:11 PM

Again Europe sits by not caring, they have a track record of this.

So why can't France and Germany say send in their own forces to restore order and prevent this? Answer is they don't care.

Would we be there if we were not tied up in Iraq now? Probably.

aklim 10-30-2006 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatterasguy (Post 1317312)
Again Europe sits by not caring, they have a track record of this.

So why can't France and Germany say send in their own forces to restore order and prevent this? Answer is they don't care.

Would we be there if we were not tied up in Iraq now? Probably.

You expected more?

Why should they? It doesn't affect them. Show me where it affects their bottom line because I don't see it.

How does it affect our bottom line? Why should our troops suffer and die for no gain?

Hatterasguy 10-30-2006 01:16 PM

Because its the right thing to do?

aklim 10-30-2006 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatterasguy (Post 1317321)
Because its the right thing to do?

Thanx, I needed a good laugh for the day.

You expect countries to do the right thing and not because it is politically convenient or benificial to them. Uhhhh, how old are you again? I was a young teenager when I believed those ideals. I soon learnt not to.

Botnst 10-30-2006 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 1317324)
Thanx, I needed a good laugh for the day.

You expect countries to do the right thing and not because it is politically convenient or benificial to them. Uhhhh, how old are you again? I was a young teenager when I believed those ideals. I soon learnt not to.

Many, many people agree with some sort of moral imperative requirement for military action. Fewer people think that strategic considerations are important. Plenty of evidence right here on this forum.

B

Vronsky 10-30-2006 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 1317324)
Thanx, I needed a good laugh for the day.

You expect countries to do the right thing and not because it is politically convenient or benificial to them. Uhhhh, how old are you again? I was a young teenager when I believed those ideals. I soon learnt not to.

:D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website