|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Scary Movie 2 -- Paul Krugman on rattling sabers towards Iran
Scary Movie 2
By PAUL KRUGMAN February 12, 2007 Attacking Iran would be a catastrophic mistake, even if all the allegations now being made about Iranian actions in Iraq are true. But it wouldn’t be the first catastrophic mistake this administration has made, and there are indications that, at the very least, a powerful faction in the administration is spoiling for a fight. Before we get to the apparent war-mongering, let’s talk about the basics. Are there people in Iran providing aid to factions in Iraq, factions that sometimes kill Americans as well as other Iraqis? Yes, probably. But you can say the same about Saudi Arabia, which is believed to be a major source of financial support for Sunni insurgents — and Sunnis, not Iranian-backed Shiites, are still responsible for most American combat deaths. The Bush administration, however, with its close personal and financial ties to the Saudis, has always downplayed Saudi connections to America’s enemies. Iran, on the other hand, which had no connection to 9/11, and was actually quite helpful to the United States in the months after the terrorist attack, somehow found itself linked with its bitter enemy Saddam Hussein as part of the “axis of evil.” So the administration has always had it in for the Iranian regime. Now, let’s do an O. J. Simpson: if you were determined to start a war with Iran, how would you do it? First, you’d set up a special intelligence unit to cook up rationales for war. A good model would be the Pentagon’s now-infamous Office of Special Plans, led by Abram Shulsky, that helped sell the Iraq war with false claims about links to Al Qaeda. Sure enough, last year Donald Rumsfeld set up a new “Iranian directorate” inside the Pentagon’s policy shop. And last September Warren Strobel and John Walcott of McClatchy Newspapers — who were among the few journalists to warn that the administration was hyping evidence on Iraqi W.M.D. — reported that “current and former officials said the Pentagon’s Iranian directorate has been headed by Abram Shulsky.” Next, you’d go for a repeat of the highly successful strategy by which scare stories about the Iraqi threat were disseminated to the public. This time, however, the assertions wouldn’t be about W.M.D.; they’d be that Iranian actions are endangering U.S. forces in Iraq. Why? Because there’s no way Congress will approve another war resolution. But if you can claim that Iran is doing evil in Iraq, you can assert that you don’t need authorization to attack — that Congress has already empowered the administration to do whatever is necessary to stabilize Iraq. And by the time the lawyers are finished arguing — well, the war would be in full swing. Finally, you’d build up forces in the area, both to prepare for the strike and, if necessary, to provoke a casus belli. There’s precedent for the idea of provocation: in a January 2003 meeting with Prime Minster Tony Blair, The New York Times reported last year, President Bush “talked about several ways to provoke a confrontation, including a proposal to paint a United States surveillance plane in the colors of the United Nations in hopes of drawing fire.” In the end, Mr. Bush decided that he didn’t need a confrontation to start that particular war. But war with Iran is a harder sell, so sending several aircraft carrier groups into the narrow waters of the Persian Gulf, where a Gulf of Tonkin-type incident could all too easily happen, might be just the thing. O.K., I hope I’m worrying too much. Those carrier groups could be going to the Persian Gulf just as a warning. But you have to wonder about the other stuff. Why would the Pentagon put someone who got everything wrong on Iraq in charge of intelligence on Iran? Why wasn’t any official willing to take personal responsibility for the reliability of alleged evidence of Iranian mischief, as opposed to being an anonymous source? If the evidence is solid enough to bear close scrutiny, why were all cameras and recording devices, including cellphones, banned from yesterday’s Baghdad briefing? It’s still hard to believe that they’re really planning to attack Iran, when it’s so obvious that another war would be a recipe for even bigger disaster. But remember who’s calling the shots: Dick Cheney thinks we’ve had “enormous successes” in Iraq.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I got an e-mail from a friend about 6 weeks ago suggesting that this administration might be planning to attack Iran. I thought at the time that this administration could not be that stupid. I am beginning to revise my opinion.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08 1985 300TD 185k+ 1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03 1985 409d 65k--sold 06 1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car 1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11 1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper 1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4 1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
lets hope not.
tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Might be planning ... Could not be that stupid...?
__________________
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I am getting the impression that there are growing numbers of people in this country who would not be inclined to believe ANTHING George W. Bush said anymore, even that the sun would rise tomorrow, Christmas is going to come in December, much less anything about Iraq or Iran.
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ... 1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold) 2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp 1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k 2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I get the impression as well. I was being sarcastic.
__________________
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
This seems to be the really disturbing part. This administration thinks there is no necessity to conform its policies to the will of the American people. I suppose this should be no surprise since the Administration has a history of trying to deliberately mislead the American people into accepting their policies. So, I guess what's happening now is that their longstanding attitude is simply becoming apparent and the American people aware of their powerlessness.
__________________
1977 300d 70k--sold 08 1985 300TD 185k+ 1984 307d 126k--sold 8/03 1985 409d 65k--sold 06 1984 300SD 315k--daughter's car 1979 300SD 122k--sold 2/11 1999 Fuso FG Expedition Camper 1993 GMC Sierra 6.5 TD 4x4 1982 Bluebird Wanderlodge CAT 3208--Sold 2/13 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Ironic that this crowd is using "DEMOCRACY" as its battle standard and cry.
The "democracy" they wanted for Iraq was one friendly to American interests, first and foremost.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K Last edited by cmac2012; 02-18-2007 at 03:12 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Just one question for Mr. Krugman...
With who's army are we to use for said invasion? I do believe we're tapped out with other interests at the moment. But that might not stop the Simpleton in Chief.
__________________
300TD W124, Two VW TDI Passat Wagons,Cummins Ram 250, Kubota Tractor 23 cylinders sipping the sweet sauce of the soy bean |
Bookmarks |
|
|