|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Researchers in PA, BURN SEAWATER!!!
Read this, about it today, the use of radio frequencies, see for yourself;
http://green.yahoo.com/index.php?q=node/1570
__________________
SONNY was right...Nobody Cares. Calogero, from the movie, "A BRONX TALE." |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
nice.. and lets see how much longer until big oil shuts him down through govt connections
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Didn't Keanu Reeves do this with Morgan Freeman in Chain Reaction?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Geez guys, they have been burning hydrogen FOREVER (Hindenburg....). All this process does is liberate hydrogen from the water. It also liberates oxygen obviously. We did this in 7th grade chemistry class around 1972 or so, nothing new here. We used electricity. I might imagine using RF takes more energy to generate than you get back. Another dud energy source (like ethanol).
__________________
MB-less |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
RF energy isn't free
Let's see how much energy is left after producing the RF.
Anyway here's a link to a video of the burning salt water, bottom right of webpage: http://www.rustumroy.com/
__________________
1985 300D Turbo "Evolution is God's way of giving upgrades" Francis Collins |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
You fill a glass beaker with salt water (fresh water does not conduct well enough). You have 2 DC electrodes pointing up. Place a test tube upside down over each and turn on the juice. It was only a few volts. You see O2 bubbles in one tube and the H bubbles in the other.
__________________
MB-less |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That's 'cause all us that went before you blowed things up with the various flammable gases.
Sorry, but it was fun.
__________________
-livin' in the terminally flippant zone |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
didn't a river in New Jersey burn in the 70's?
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
One in Cleveland did.
And like the guys said, this is just another case of putting in 10 watts and getting two out. RF at decent power levels is expensive to make. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
F**k thermodynamics: I want something for nothing.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The peat and young coals are readily available through the Dakotas and Montana. While they don't provide the heat that the mature coals do, they do have a lower sulfur content. They are looking to build some plants near those deposits so that trucking can be taken out of the equation making it more BTU efficient and a viable (read profitable ) source. There is a lot of new technology out there, trying to get it to be an efficient source is the key. Anything other than nuclear power has efficiency and stack emission issues that need to be overcome.
__________________
1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15 '06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
1983 123.133 California - GreaseCar Veg System |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
"Roy will meet this week with officials from the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to try to obtain research funding."
Never happen... Now if he was in West Virgina Senator Byrd would get him funding
__________________
"I have no convictions ... I blow with the wind, and the prevailing wind happens to be from Vichy" Current Monika '74 450 SL BrownHilda '79 280SL FoxyCleopatra '99 Chevy Suburban Scarlett 2014 Jeep Cherokee Krystal 2004 Volvo S60 Gone '74 Jeep CJ5 '97 Jeep ZJ Laredo Rudolf ‘86 300SDL Bruno '81 300SD Fritzi '84 BMW '92 Subaru '96 Impala SS '71 Buick GS conv '67 GTO conv '63 Corvair conv '57 Nomad |
Bookmarks |
|
|