Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2008, 01:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 148
I really hate FWD cars...why why why are they so popular

I had to drive a 07 Impala at work today. The car had somewhere near 5,000 miles on it, but I was ever so glad to get back into my 1983 Mercedes. I had to feather the pedal to take off so it would not spin the front wheels. Who would want something like this. The interior felt cheap. The uphostery was cheap and unacctractive.

I know that I have had three cars from 1983 a 1983 Volvo 244 turbo, a 1983 Mercedes 500 SL AMG and a 1983 BMW 633 CSI. I would rather ride a motorcycle everday then drive one of these soalless fwd econoboxes. I know that I'm talking about high end cars but hey they are 24 years oldr then this other stuff that some refer to as cars.

No wonder GM is in trouble. I think that the 1994 -1996 impala SS was actually an interesting car, I woudn't buy it, but for what it was it was decent. So now they have taken that same name and turned it into a Camry. I guess the camry is not a terrible car, I would just fall asleep at the wheel drving it.

Again I ask why the move to FWD. and Furthermore, why do people go for it?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2008, 01:27 AM
johnathan1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Downey, SoCal
Posts: 1,190
People buy them, mainly because they don't know anything about cars, and more importantly, they don't care... Your average consumer/econobox driver could care less about the performance of their car...just so long as it gets them from Point A to point B, and gets good mileage.

Oh, and they're cheap to buy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2008, 01:49 AM
123c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Douglas County
Posts: 3
I almost prefer FWD and AWD cars now, over RWD cars, the biggest factor here, is that they go better in the snow, and in nasty weather conditions. My 300CD did ok in the snow, but not as well as my Corolla, and my truck was worthless in the snow, unless I had it in 4-Lo.
__________________
1999 Toyota Corolla VE (Mine)
2006 Honda Odyssey (Wife's)
1979 300CD (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2008, 02:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Without traction control FWD is definitely easier on snow or ice. You just have to watch out for understeer but that's easier to manage than oversteer on RWD vehicles. FWD is also easier to maintain since there's no differential or driveshaft (old splitting flex discs come to mind). Drive the vehicle with the configuration you like and quit whining. I have one of each and I have no complaints (my RWD MB has traction control).
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2008, 03:44 AM
Jim B.'s Avatar
Who's flying this thing ?
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N. California./ N. Nevada
Posts: 3,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by nh500sl View Post
I had to drive a 07 Impala at work today. The car had somewhere near 5,000 miles on it, but I was ever so glad to get back into my 1983 Mercedes. I had to feather the pedal to take off so it would not spin the front wheels. Who would want something like this. The interior felt cheap. The uphostery was cheap and unacctractive.

I know that I have had three cars from 1983 a 1983 Volvo 244 turbo, a 1983 Mercedes 500 SL AMG and a 1983 BMW 633 CSI. I would rather ride a motorcycle everday then drive one of these soalless fwd econoboxes. I know that I'm talking about high end cars but hey they are 24 years oldr then this other stuff that some refer to as cars.

No wonder GM is in trouble. I think that the 1994 -1996 impala SS was actually an interesting car, I woudn't buy it, but for what it was it was decent. So now they have taken that same name and turned it into a Camry. I guess the camry is not a terrible car, I would just fall asleep at the wheel drving it.

Again I ask why the move to FWD. and Furthermore, why do people go for it?
I agree.

After the last RWD Volvo (the V90) ceased production, at that very moment I mentally drew a line through the world "VOLVO" as a car company from which I would ever buy a new anything again.

I sure hated to do that.


So far as GM is concerned, they haven't made passenger cars for YEARS that I would even think of buying.

If I brought a new one home one the neighbors wouldn't even wonder "where he got that new car"

They would wonder why he rented one.....


Besides that, who wants to drive a car that sounds like a vacuum cleaner with a leaky cannister when you stomp it into passing gear?
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ...

1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold)

2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp

1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k

2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold)

Last edited by Jim B.; 02-22-2008 at 04:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2008, 03:51 AM
Ara T.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,075
I dont mind some FWD cars, they can still be made to handle well. There are a ton of fat, bloated RWD cars that understeer about as badly as most FWD cars (stock W123 300D turbo comes to mind.. plus it doesn't have enough torque/power to power-oversteer).
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:29 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,613
I had a couple of Saabs. I liked them ok but the rwd car with good balance like a benz is much more pleasureable to drive and safer in snow in almost all conditions. The fwd will get you out of a parking space with a lot of snow or your driveway but in every dynamic driving condition the well balanced rwd is safer and more controllable especially in the hands of a driver who understands the difference and drives accordingly.

FWD is more space effecient and cheaper to build, but more difficult and more expensive to service.

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:42 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Tom pretty much said it all. I would just add that in low-traction situations, FWD is just safer FOR MOST PEOPLE. Having the front wheels pull, as opposed to the rear wheels pushing ( often at a tangent to the intended direction of travel), makes for better directional control.

The argument initially raised regarding the soulessness of FWD is rather misdirected; Most modern cars either FWD or RWD are souless, and appliance-like. Such is what "the public" evidently wants.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:46 AM
Geezer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnathan1 View Post
People buy them, mainly because they don't know anything about cars, and more importantly, they don't care... Your average consumer/econobox driver could not care less about the performance of their car...just so long as it gets them from Point A to point B, and gets good mileage.

Oh, and they're cheap to buy.
Wow, just like Henry Ford's Model T that revolutionized American transportation.

The majority of people just want transportation, and are not obsessed with getting to 60mph 0.1s sooner at each traffic light.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:52 AM
rickg's Avatar
User friendly
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Utah!!
Posts: 4,494
We've "been there, done that" on this issue here several times.
FWD, great for snow, I don't care what anyone says. 30 plus years of driving in both FWD & RWD, so I'm far from an inexperienced driver. On Seattle hilly-snowy-icey roads, I'll take FWD anyday. Period.
My Lexus has all that traction control crap and it's RWD, I keep it out of the snow!
Normal, dry road driving, I don't really care which I drive. How the hell can you tell, unless you're dumping the clutch everytime you take off? If you're doing that, go back to driving school.
__________________
past MB rides:
'68 220D
'68 220D(another one)
'67 230
'84 SD
Current rides:
'06 Lexus RX330
'93 Ford F-250
'96 Corvette
'99 Polaris 700 RMK sled
2011 Polaris Assault
'86 Yamaha TT350(good 'ol thumper)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-22-2008, 08:13 AM
Pete Geither's Avatar
Half Fast Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Western Pa.
Posts: 2,417
Tires, tires, tires. My wifes' 400E with 4 studded, narrow, snows is positively awsome in the snow and ice, as is my wagon. She would never go near as well in a front wheel drive. What you grew up with driving has a lot to do with it.
__________________
95 SL500 Smoke Silver, Parchment 64K
07 E350 4matic Station Wagon White 34K
02 E320 4Matic Silver/grey 80K
05 F150 Silver 44K
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-22-2008, 08:16 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,613
The difference is at the limit of traction. A nose heavy car whether FWD or RWD will plow off the road on the outside. A car with equal balance like most benzes will just begin to slip sideways and will tighten its line if you let off the gas.

For my self, I much prefer it.

The other thing about fwd is if you happen to find yourself on glare ice and you just let off the gas in a turn the car will lose traction. This effect is probably negated at least to some extent by modern traction and skid control devices though.

For most folks if the above situation occurred would not know how to regain steering (put the car in neutral).

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-22-2008, 09:37 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Tom,
MOST people have no idea how to counteract a skid in any kind of car. They also do not know how to use the brakes--thats why we have anti-lock braking systems. Cars are designed for the "least common denominator" type of driver. i.e. a driver who does not know how to drive.
Then the ad guys go to work, and tell people that the car SHOULD do all the work for you.
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-22-2008, 10:05 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
For winter driving conditions I will stick to my Subaru. I am considering an Audi A8 as a replacement though.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-22-2008, 10:34 AM
Dee8go's Avatar
Senor User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The People's Republic of Arlington, VA
Posts: 7,193
I can't fathom why they are so popular. I hate them.

__________________
" We have nothing to fear but the main stream media itself . . . ."- Adapted from Franklin D Roosevelt for the 21st century

OBK #55

1998 Lincoln Continental - Sold
Max 1984 300TD 285,000 miles - Sold
The Dee8gonator 1987 560SEC 196,000 miles - Sold
Orgasmatron - 2006 CLS500 90,000 miles
2002 C320 Wagon 122,000 miles
2016 AMG GTS 12,000 miles
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page