|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Buchanan talks sense on Afghanistan
PAT BUCHANAN: 'Winning' in Afghanistan a losing game
February 16, 2009 By Pat Buchanan Creators Syndicate The day before Richard Holbrooke arrived in Kabul, eight suicide bombers and gunmen attacked the Justice and Education ministries, killing 26 and wounding 57. Kabul was paralyzed, as the Taliban displayed an ability to wreak havoc within a hundred yards of the presidential palace. The assault came as President Obama is both conducting a strategic review and deciding how many additional U.S. troops to send. Earlier, there was talk of 30,000, bringing the U.S. total to 63,000. Now, there are reports Obama may commit no more than the three brigades promised in 2008, and only one brigade now. Clearly, the United States is checking its hole card. Can we draw to a winning hand? Or is this hand an inevitable loser -- and we must cut our losses and cede the pot? No longer, anywhere, is there talk of "victory." Nor is the diplomatic news good. Last week, Kyrgyzstan gave us six months to vacate Manas, the air base used to resupply U.S. forces. A week before, guerrillas blew up a bridge in the Khyber, cutting the 1,000-mile supply line from Karachi to Kabul. Before that, guerrillas bombed U.S. truck parks in Pakistan. While in Pakistan, Holbrooke was told by all to whom he spoke that, while U.S. Predator strikes may be killing Taliban and al-Qaida, the deaths among tribal peoples are turning Pakistan against us. What would winning Afghanistan for democracy profit us, if the price were losing a nuclear-armed Pakistan to Islamism? The expulsion from Manas, after Kyrgyzstan received a reported $2 billion in aid from Moscow, raises a question. Is Russia restarting "The Great Game" she played against Victoria's Empire in Central Asia, which ended in 1907 with a British-Russian entente, dividing Iran into spheres of influence, with both sides agreeing to keep hands off Afghanistan? As Russia has as great an interest in preventing an Islamist Kabul, and has assisted NATO's resupply of its forces, why would Moscow seek to expel us from a base vital to the war effort? Does Russia simply seek to be recognized by the United States as the hegemon of Central Asia, the sole great power that decides who can and who cannot use former Soviet bases? For if Manas is closed and the Karachi-Khyber-Kabul supply line is compromised or cut, Obama would seem to have but three options. First would be to go back, hat-in-hand, to Islam Karimov, the Uzbek ruler charged with grave human rights violations, and ask him to reopen the Karshi-Khanabad (K2) air base, from which we were expelled in 2005. And what would be Karimov's asking price? Second is the Russia option. If Moscow now holds the whip hand in the old Soviet republics, what is Moscow's price to let us remain in Manas or use other Soviet bases over which it wields veto power? The answer is obvious. Neither Georgia nor Ukraine is to be brought into NATO. The independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, won in the August war with Georgia, is not to be challenged. The U.S anti-missile missiles planned for Poland are not to be deployed. In turn, Russia will cancel any missile deployment in Kaliningrad, recommits to the terms of all conventional forces agreements in Europe and assist in the effort in Afghanistan. Russia rejoins the West, and the West stays off Russia's front porch. Be not surprised if the Russians come trolling before an overextended American empire an end to the Great Game in Central Asia like the one the ministers of Nicholas II offered the ministers of Edward VII. And the third option? It is Iran. Before 9-11, Iran was more hostile to the anti-Shia Taliban than we, and it has no desire to see them return. Indeed, Tehran was a supporter of the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as both were ruled by mortal enemies. The long way for U.S. and NATO war materiel to reach Kabul via Iran would be through a Turkey-Kurdistan-Iran supply line. The shorter would be from Iranian ports straight into Afghanistan. Price of an entente? An end to the 30-year U.S.-Iranian cold war and a strategic bargain whereby Iran is allowed to develop peaceful nuclear power, under supervision, the United States lifts its embargo, and regime change is left to the Iranian people. President Ahmadinejad, no fool, and facing an uncertain election this year, is already signaling interest in negotiations with Obama. A complication. How would "Bibi" Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman regard a U.S.-Iran rapprochement -- to prevent a Taliban triumph in Kabul? Yet, if the Taliban's enemies in Russia, Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia will not assist us, this war cannot end well. And if they will not help, Obama should cut America's losses, come home and let their neighbors deal with a triumphant Taliban.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
So stall for more time then? I mean it will take the Taliban a few years to get into the position to do something then we can go back?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If ever there was a horrendous policy of Bush's that needs fixing, it's the one towards Iran.
__________________
1984 300TD |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The suicide bomber is a nasty development and one that is going to be hard to stop from now on. The hill people of Afghanistan and Pakistan are tough as nails and about as smart. Their entire lives require a great deal of scampering about hills; much, much more than the average American. I don't see any easy answers, and bankrupting ourselves in the process of creating more enemies certainly doesn't look like a good one. Unless you want to make OBL look like a prophet.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'll look for it later, I gotta split now.
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
It will be interesting to see what audaciously hopeful moves the administration makes. So far they look familiar .....
B |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You mean Rick Steve? I only caught the end of his travel documentary on Iran and I'm hoping PBS will re-air the show soon.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I'd rather be a hammer than a nail.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
And create millions more who will seek revenge. Not to mention the area in question has a rugged terrain with low-density population.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual) Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark Formerly... 2000 GMC Sonoma 1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021 2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels 1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles. 1984 123 200 1979 116 280S 1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille 1971 108 280S |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
"The Power of Nightmares" - search on Google video
This is a great series that gives the history of the "NeoCons" as well as the mess that started all of this extremism. If you have the time, watch all three parts! They are an hour each. Check out part two; it skips the background and goes straight to Afghanistan
__________________
Dan 2005 E320 CDI - 246k 1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k Past: 1987 300D - 264k |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
LMFAO I love the Republican outrage at Afganistan...yeah its all Obamas fault! The sudden memory loss of the Republicans if great. Who took us into Afganistan? Who took us into Iraq? Well news flash it wasn't Obama. And If we leave Afganistan we will leave millions without hope. And more importantly we will create many more enemies. Republicans were all about Afganistan in the beginning what happened?
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Would have been good at Tora Bora. Besides, we already have the millions who don't like us. What is a few more? BTW, didn't really work out that way in Japan did it?
__________________
01 Ford Excursion Powerstroke 99 E300 Turbodiesel 91 Vette with 383 motor 05 Polaris Sportsman 800 EFI 06 Polaris Sportsman 500 EFI 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Red 03 SeaDoo GTX SC Yellow 04 Tailgator 21 ft Toy Hauler 11 Harley Davidson 883 SuperLow |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We can't create more enemies by not being there...
__________________
Dan 2005 E320 CDI - 246k 1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k Past: 1987 300D - 264k |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|