PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Discussion (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Hey Joe College. Spare me a dime? (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=268261)

okyoureabeast 12-28-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kknudson (Post 2369989)
First I don't think the majority of the college grads I've dealt with really got their moneys worth.
They have the book learning, well some do, but little or no practical experience.
I always loved when they had a problem, threw fixes at it until they gave up, came to me. In less time than they spent on the first 'fix', I'd show them the problem and outline the solution.
Half the time they still came back to me to help with the solution.

Oh and then my fav was an MBA (recent grad) that I had to explain what ROI meant, fortunately in front of the CEO(I did try cover for him). He'd been with the company for years, got his degree via tutition reimbursment, he was gone several weeks later. Oh he was my boss at the time, a nice guy, but a very bad boss.


IMHO half (problably more) of the problem with rising college costs goes back to the government, match it to the housing bubble but I don't know how this one unwinds.

The more grants, low interest loans, tax breaks etc the government hands out, the more the colleges raise their price, so the government throws more grants etc, so the colleges raise their rates, so the .....

Part of it is basic economics, the law of supply and demand, as the government throws more money for kids to go to college, more go, again ...

And how many grads do you know that actually work in their field after a few years.

College was never meant as a means of job training. It was meant as a "pursuit" of truth and knowledge to broadly apply that knowledge to problems one may encounter in his or her life.

Sadly like I said earlier undergraduate and to some point graduate level degrees have become nothing more then pieces of paper that allow you to bypass the first level of HR pruning.

kknudson 12-28-2009 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 732002 (Post 2370037)
return on investment?

I don't see the gov handing out money for college.
FAFSA estimated we could afford a massive amount, seems they
look at your home equity, sure we could sell our house to pay for college

Yes, ROI is Return on Investment.
We had to make a choice between 2 projects.
The one he was pushing was breakeven with optimistic estimates after a year.
The other, while requiring almost 50% more investment, would pay for itself in 6 month tops, with very conservative numbers. And it did.
Fortunately the CEO knew I used conservative numbers as a rule AND put in a cushion in the cost to cover those inevitable problems.
So I explained that his project did not have the ROI needed to justify it.
He looked at me puzzled so I explained the numbers, and repeated it didn't have the ROI. This time I came back and asked what he didn't understand, thats when he said he I shouldn't use technical terms, like ROI, in a briefing with management aka the Board and CEO. OOPS. The CFO explained the term to him.

"Handing Out" is probably a bad choice of words.
How about "Makes Available".

BodhiBenz1987 12-28-2009 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dynalow (Post 2369553)
"Well, I'm going to grad school and if I can get a job paying $100,000 when I finish, I'll be ok!" I was left speechless!:eek: Her major was something in literature or language iirc.[/I][/B]

If I had the energy, I'd laugh. Yeah ... lit major probably not going to land that 100k gig. Ever. Let alone right out of college.

Craig 12-29-2009 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BodhiBenz1987 (Post 2370123)
If I had the energy, I'd laugh. Yeah ... lit major probably not going to land that 100k gig. Ever. Let alone right out of college.

I know a couple of people who do OK as spokespersons (PR folks) for large companies and government agencies. These organizations often need people who can translate from geek to english and write a coherent press release.

Craig 12-29-2009 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by okyoureabeast (Post 2370041)
College was never meant as a means of job training. It was meant as a "pursuit" of truth and knowledge to broadly apply that knowledge to problems one may encounter in his or her life.

Sadly like I said earlier undergraduate and to some point graduate level degrees have become nothing more then pieces of paper that allow you to bypass the first level of HR pruning.

I agree. Unfortunately, much of the the specific information taught will be obsolete in 10-15 years; the real function of college/university is to teach critical thinking.

Kuan 12-29-2009 08:44 AM

You college bashers have not seen the good side of college. Most science related jobs require an advanced degree. All of science is built on foundations established hundreds, or even thousands, of years ago. There is no Physics without Archimedes, there is no Math without Al Jabr, no Logic without Aristotle.

An BS in EE over here starts at $55k. That's not bad for a four year. A Master's in Chem. E starts at $65k, a PhD around $70k.

tbomachines 12-29-2009 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dynalow (Post 2369553)
My kids are finished with college, but how are you college boys...and your parents...getting through the process?


I met a young girl a few months ago who was going to graduate with loans over $100,000. When I asked her about working and repaymenty plans, her reply was: "Well, I'm going to grad school and if I can get a job paying $100,000 when I finish, I'll be ok!" I was left speechless!:eek: Her major was something in literature or language iirc.

Hmm...I seem to remember this conversation :D

Working working, paying off the loans little by little, thats all I can do. My GF (whom I believe you are referring to above) still can't find a job anywhere, and even the connections through school to internships are generally unpaid (she is psychology major). One day both me and her will be pretty well paid, but both have to fund PhD's to get there...its definitely a challenge. Doesn't help that we go to school with a lot of rich spoiled kids either :rolleyes:

edit: I should add that I do believe that every penny spent on my education has been 100% worth it. College helped me grow up and realize how much I love my field. 5 years ago I never would have thought I'd have a liberal arts degree, or even be headed to grad school for that matter.

Craig 12-29-2009 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kuan (Post 2370250)
An BS in EE over here starts at $55k. That's not bad for a four year. A Master's in Chem. E starts at $65k, a PhD around $70k.

Those numbers sound about right. The problem with engineering pay is that it flattens out at 10-15 years for most people (very low six figures). At that point you need to go into management or go out on your own to grow your income. I worked for a consulting company for 18 years, then went out on my own to do what I wanted and to avoid having to become a manager.

MTI 12-29-2009 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kuan (Post 2370250)
You college bashers have not seen the good side of college. Most science related jobs require an advanced degree. All of science is built on foundations established hundreds, or even thousands, of years ago. There is no Physics without Archimedes, there is no Math without Al Jabr, no Logic without Aristotle.

Quite true, but there seems to be plenty of masters and doctoral candidates that are nowhere near achieving their "full potential" in their field. There is a sizable population of those serial matriculators that wind up in retail, food service . . . or, dare I even mention it . . . consulting work. :D

dynalow 12-29-2009 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbomachines (Post 2370267)
Hmm...I seem to remember this conversation :D

Working working, paying off the loans little by little, thats all I can do. My GF (whom I believe you are referring to above) still can't find a job anywhere, and even the connections through school to internships are generally unpaid (she is psychology major). One day both me and her will be pretty well paid, but both have to fund PhD's to get there...its definitely a challenge. Doesn't help that we go to school with a lot of rich spoiled kids either :rolleyes:

edit: I should add that I do believe that every penny spent on my education has been 100% worth it. College helped me grow up and realize how much I love my field. 5 years ago I never would have thought I'd have a liberal arts degree, or even be headed to grad school for that matter.


Tom,
I hope I didn't offend you by relating our conversation. I am not being critical of her (and her parents) decision. Sadly, there are probably thousands like her graduating every year. I was stunned by the magnitude of the debt she's leaving there with. I'm just pissed off that colleges fill the rooms and giant lecture halls with students, take your (borrowed) money, hand you a diploma, then turn around and ask you to give to the Endowment Fund. :rolleyes:

With third party direct pay (Hello Mr. Pell) or financing (Hello Messrs. Perkins and Stafford) available, colleges for the last few decades have had little incentive to keep costs low and tuition reasonable. I also think there is a prestige premium built in to the tuition. Probably anywhere from 10 to 30% depending on how "big" the name or how high they are in College Rankings by USNWR. Do you think if the school was, say, ranked number 20 instead of where it is, it would be able to charge as much as it does? I don't.

I also sympathize with today's graduates who have to look for work in a very, very difficut job climate. One that in my opinion will be very challenging for 3 to 5 years. Lots of old timers still hanging on out of economic necessity.


Happy New Year to you both :).... and good ridance to this sorry decade.:(

Kuan 12-29-2009 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig (Post 2370318)
Those numbers sound about right. The problem with engineering pay is that it flattens out at 10-15 years for most people (very low six figures). At that point you need to go into management or go out on your own to grow your income. I worked for a consulting company for 18 years, then went out on my own to do what I wanted and to avoid having to become a manager.

I think that's just the natural progression. Some companies have different management tracks so you can get into the technical side or the business side. From what I see, technical manager or director is really cool. You get to go test new equipment and technology, break things and not have to pay for them, oversee a bunch of lab monkeys, etc. :D

Craig 12-29-2009 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kuan (Post 2370467)
I think that's just the natural progression. Some companies have different management tracks so you can get into the technical side or the business side. From what I see, technical manager or director is really cool. You get to go test new equipment and technology, break things and not have to pay for them, oversee a bunch of lab monkeys, etc. :D

It depends what field your working in. Personally, I would rather engineer than manage people. I have friends who are now managers in engineering companies, they spent too much time listening to people complain about their last raise or their next assignment. I'm glad I got out of the dilbert world; more freedom, less hassle, better money, no job security, no benefits. ;)

tbomachines 12-29-2009 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dynalow (Post 2370455)
Tom,
I hope I didn't offend you by relating our conversation. I am not being critical of her (and her parents) decision. Sadly, there are probably thousands like her graduating every year. I was stunned by the magnitude of the debt she's leaving there with. I'm just pissed off that colleges fill the rooms and giant lecture halls with students, take your (borrowed) money, hand you a diploma, then turn around and ask you to give to the Endowment Fund. :rolleyes:

With third party direct pay (Hello Mr. Pell) or financing (Hello Messrs. Perkins and Stafford) available, colleges for the last few decades have had little incentive to keep costs low and tuition reasonable. I also think there is a prestige premium built in to the tuition. Probably anywhere from 10 to 30% depending on how "big" the name or how high they are in College Rankings by USNWR. Do you think if the school was, say, ranked number 20 instead of where it is, it would be able to charge as much as it does? I don't.

I also sympathize with today's graduates who have to look for work in a very, very difficut job climate. One that in my opinion will be very challenging for 3 to 5 years. Lots of old timers still hanging on out of economic necessity.


Happy New Year to you both :).... and good ridance to this sorry decade.:(


No offense taken at all! I've found that my classmates fell into two categories--one group would take out tons of loans, hope for the best and work hard to make sure they get their moneys worth. The other half has it fully paid for by parents and generally doesn't take it too seriously...my gf and I both part of the former. There is surprisingly little middle ground between the two. I agree that the price of colleges and the "prestige" factor is somewhat sickening. Especially since doing well on NCAA athletics, the school has gotten massive amounts of attention so they don't need to dish out the financial aid as much. They can take all the "top" students coming from elite private schools, leaving little room for the masses below.

My brother graduated 4 years ahead of me into a great job market. His loans are nearly all paid off by now whereas just a few years later, a large percentage of graduates will be working retail jobs to pay high five and six figure debts...just dumb luck. He's making over twice as much as me with mediocre grades/experience and bachelor's degree where I'm halfway through a Masters program, blah blah blah sibling rivalry. I generally say good for him though, he better not lose that job...

And happy new year to you and your family as well! :thumbup:

Skid Row Joe 12-29-2009 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 2369718)
It shows me as an employer that you can commit to something and achieve it. That is something important to me. I would rather see that as opposed to somebody who has flights of fancy.

"As an employer," you're lookin' in the wrong place if you think education assures you of anything they'll do in your employ. Previous OTJT is the highest form of assurance. -Actual performance trumps 'education' every time. Ask me how I know.

Skid Row Joe 12-30-2009 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig (Post 2369675)
I wouldn't recommend doing the community collage route unless it is necessary due to cost or grades. Community collage is not the same experience as a four-year college, and many students will lose a year due to transfer credits not being accepted. For some people it's the only way to able to obtain a degree, but it's not optimum.

If 2-year community colleges aren't "real schools," as you stated in another post.....what are they?

Craig 12-30-2009 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 2370922)
If 2-year community colleges aren't "real schools," as you stated in another post.....what are they?

I was responding to another post that used the term "real schools," I have nothing against community colleges; they provide opportunities to millions of people who would not be able to attend 4-year college/university for various reasons.

They do have a reputation of being the "13th grade," because they tend to lack the traditional college experience. They also tend to be very vocational, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Skid Row Joe 12-30-2009 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig (Post 2369673)
Regardless of work plans, I would recommend almost everyone having some post-secondary education. Not everyone wants/needs a degree, but having some formal education is always a good thing. Many young people (including myself, at the time) thought of college as a trade school, that is a missed opportunity to actually learn something.

Not true. Wasting time in post-secondary education did little for my self-employed career as a sales agency principle, in manufacturer's representation. I learned zilch in the 3 years spent in college environments that I use in my company. I'm starting my 37th year next week as an agency principle, I might add.

If you believe it does, then you must outline exactly what it does do for any individual. What ifs and maybes don't cut it.

Skid Row Joe 12-30-2009 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig (Post 2370928)
I was responding to another post that used the term "real schools," I have nothing against community colleges; they provide opportunities to millions of people who would not be able to attend 4-year college/university for various reasons.

They do have a reputation of being the "13th grade," because they tend to lack the traditional college experience. They also tend to be very vocational, not that there's anything wrong with that.

I believe you're dead wrong calling them "13th grade" schools. They are real schools. Why you claim they are not is certainly puzzling.

Skid Row Joe 12-30-2009 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hatterasguy (Post 2369911)
State schools are becoming popular because people can afford them.

Always have been too. In state, state schooling would be the way to go for anyone seeking the most for the least money.

Private schools and out-of-state college educations are totally not worth it. One of my Brothers is into the out-of-state, private, parochial education deal for his kids. He and his wife cash-flow $70K a year for three of their college kids right now. One attends a school 1,300 miles from their Omaha, NE. home. -So not worth it, in my experience with college-educated people in my industry.

aklim 12-30-2009 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 2370916)
"As an employer," you're lookin' in the wrong place if you think education assures you of anything they'll do in your employ. Previous OTJT is the highest form of assurance. -Actual performance trumps 'education' every time. Ask me how I know.

It is not just the education I am talking about. I don't care if it is education or the Marines, Army or whatever. I am looking for whether you are going to be able to be there when things get tough or whether you will have flights of fancy. When you hire a 20 yo person, you aren't going to get much OTJT history to look at. At 30 yo, you get some and so on. Problem with On The Job Training ONLY is that it becomes hard to evaluate whether the person has the perseverance to stick to a course. Take this girl I know who has changed many majors in 10 years. Is that a plus? Hell no. She doesn't know what she wants and changes it like her hairstyle. Might she be capable? Sure. Is it going to help me if she gets a job with me and spends a lot of training time and then quit because she got bored with it?

The nice thing about college is that it tells me what you are like during a 4 yr period. I want to know if you can stick to your plan even when it gets really rough. If you are like the girl I mentioned who changed 5 majors in 10 years before you graduate, IMO, you are suspect. Looks to me like you don't think things thru, change when the going gets tough. Are you someone I want to invest much time and money in?

TheDon 12-30-2009 12:31 AM

CC is a joke and a waste of time.. I found that out the hard way.

Craig 12-30-2009 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 2370930)
Not true. Wasting time in post-secondary education did little for my self-employed career as a sales agency principle, in manufacturer's representation. I learned zilch in the 3 years spent in college environments that I use in my company. I'm starting my 37th year next week as an agency principle, I might add.

If you believe it does, then you must outline exactly what it does do for any individual. What ifs and maybes don't cut it.

Sorry, maybe everyone does not value education that cannot be directly translated to a job skill. I happen to think "non-vocational" education is just as important as learning a marketable trade; not everyone will agree. My grandfather was very successful with a 6th grade education.

I was repeating the "13th grade" comment that I've heard about 1000 times. It refers to the environment of many community colleges. I have a daughter attending a community college part-time, they do provide a very valuable service. However, they tend to "feel" like a continuation of high school, and they do not attract top students so the learning environment can be less than optimum. I have nothing against them, and I'm glad they exist; but I would not recommend them to someone who has the resources/grades to attend a traditional college/university and is looking for a well-rounded education. IMO, they are essentially post-secondary trade schools (which is exactly what some folks want/need).

aklim 12-30-2009 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craig (Post 2370958)
I happen to think "non-vocational" education is just as important as learning a marketable trade; not everyone will agree.

My grandfather was very successful with a 6th grade education.

I would say that it depends. If you were like me when I graduated, I think not. I had a wife who was legally unable to get a job and I had no real funds except a small stipend that was run out, had to play musical credit cards to get some food till I got a job. OTOH, if you have a positive bank balance and/or assurance of funds, sure.

My grandfather made a good living back then with that level of education. Of course, the education level back then was way different so it is hard to compare.

Craig 12-30-2009 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDon (Post 2370945)
CC is a joke and a waste of time.. I found that out the hard way.

It depends on the situation. One of my undergrad classmates had dropped out of high school due to some personal "issues." After several years he took a GED spent two years in a CC and ended up being very successful in an engineering program at university. I think it's possible to ignore all the "high school" BS at a CC and collect some credits to put towards a degree. I would think of it as an intermediate step for many students.

Craig 12-30-2009 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aklim (Post 2370960)
I would say that it depends. If you were like me when I graduated, I think not. I had a wife who was legally unable to get a job and I had no real funds except a small stipend that was run out, had to play musical credit cards to get some food till I got a job. OTOH, if you have a positive bank balance and/or assurance of funds, sure.

Obviously, a liberal education is a luxury; you have to take care of the necessities before you spend $50K to study medieval french literature. I do think education for it's own sake is a valuable experience; only if you are interested and have the resources. I wasn't mature enough to appreciate that when I was 20.

Skid Row Joe 12-30-2009 12:56 AM

Any smart company will start their new-hires at the bottom, and let them work their way up. Especially college grads. There is no way to quantify their contribution to a company with their degree. Pedigree in education means nothing - doing the job well, and learning fast means everything to an employer. OTJT as an intern might give an indication of their potential contribution as well. If a college grad has no OTJT, that's not my problem as an employer, when I can find people with it.

Craig 12-30-2009 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skid Row Joe (Post 2370967)
Any smart company will start their new-hires at the bottom, and let them work their way up. Especially college grads. There is no way to quantify their contribution to a company with their degree. Pedigree in education means nothing - doing the job well, and learning fast means everything to an employer. OTJT as an intern might give an indication of their potential contribution as well. If a college grad has no OTJT, that's not my problem as an employer, when I can find people with it.

It depends on the nature of the business, and what they expect from new hires. Small companies often need to hire experienced people because they can't afford a learning curve. Some large organizations prefer to hire new grads that they can train for a couple of years to do things "their way." I know some organizations that will only hire people from the top 5 or 10% of their graduating class, based on the assumption that they will be high achievers.

I have also seen some very bright people leave jobs after a short amount of time because they were forced to "start at the bottom." If you are going to hire smart, motivated people you need to keep them interested and challenged or they will quit. I think it's mostly a matter of matching the skill set to the job.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website