Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:01 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
Getting a gun...

With the recent events in AZ it got me thinking about gun control fanatics and the process of obtaining a gun. I realize it varies from state to state. It is obvious that the kid was a nutcase and should not have been anywhere near a gun.

There should be more background checks. This kid was turned down by the US Military and was expelled from college pending a pysch exam. It baffles me how he was allowed to buy a gun.

__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:08 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
What, you mean actually institute a Well Regulated Militia like the Constitution says? According to the Right, the Constitution is un-Constitutional!

Owning a gun should require the same things as owning a car. Obtaining a license, which would include passing a typical psychological exam as is used when enlisting in the Armed Forces, passing a background check for felonies and proving one could competently operate a firearm, followed by the registration of the firearm after proving one has obtained insurance coverage in case of it's accidental use. I am not against owning guns, I am against lunatics, felons and terrorists owning guns. The Constitution says gun owners comprise a Well-regulated Militia. Well, they don't.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:16 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwbuge View Post
With the recent events in AZ it got me thinking about gun control fanatics and the process of obtaining a gun. I realize it varies from state to state. It is obvious that the kid was a nutcase and should not have been anywhere near a gun.

There should be more background checks. This kid was turned down by the US Military and was expelled from college pending a pysch exam. It baffles me how he was allowed to buy a gun.
I assume that the criterion is that you don't have a criminal record. I'm not sure it matters, how hard is it to buy/steal an illegal gun?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:17 AM
retmil46's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
He may not have even bought it from a licensed dealer - did some horsetrading with an acquaintance, borrowed from a friend or relative - he may even have had the gun in his possession long before he started going off the deep end.

No system of background checks is ever going to be perfect - and not arguing that the present system couldn't stand a lot of improvement - and there are always going to be a few individuals that fall thru the cracks.

IMHO, anyone wanting to purchase an easily concealed firearm should have to go thru a "gun safety" course with the local law enforcement - such that the authorities get the chance to get a long hard look at their background, and also see the individual in person and get a read on their state of mind.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:20 AM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
What, you mean actually institute a Well Regulated Militia like the Constitution says? According to the Right, the Constitution is un-Constitutional!

Owning a gun should require the same things as owning a car. Obtaining a license, which would include passing a typical psychological exam as is used when enlisting in the Armed Forces, passing a background check for felonies and proving one could competently operate a firearm, followed by the registration of the firearm after proving one has obtained insurance coverage in case of it's accidental use. I am not against owning guns, I am against lunatics, felons and terrorists owning guns. The Constitution says gun owners comprise a Well-regulated Militia. Well, they don't.
JR- I agree with you 100%. As long as my PA concealed carry permit would be valid in any other state, Just like Drivers Licenses right?
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:20 AM
toomany MBZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: central Va
Posts: 7,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
I am not against owning guns, I am against lunatics, felons and terrorists owning guns. The Constitution says gun owners comprise a Well-regulated Militia. Well, they don't.
I'm all for self protection as well, even from a suppressive government.

The 2nd amendment doesn't mention nut cases.

This is very sad set of circumstances. Also sad and unalterable is the fact human beings do the background checks, less than perfect human beings.

My thoughts go out to all the victims.
__________________
83 SD

84 CD
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:22 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by retmil46 View Post
He may not have even bought it from a licensed dealer - did some horsetrading with an acquaintance, borrowed from a friend or relative - he may even have had the gun in his possession long before he started going off the deep end.
He purchased the gun this past November from a licensed gun dealer.
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:25 AM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by buffa98 View Post
JR- I agree with you 100%. As long as my PA concealed carry permit would be valid in any other state, Just like Drivers Licenses right?
State concealed carry laws are on their way to being ruled un-Constitutional, I wouldn't worry about it. Carrying guns is a right granted under the Bill of Rights, and states should have absolutely nothing to do with regulating their use, it should all be federal.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2011, 11:32 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
A bunch of states now fall under or participate in Reciprocity Agreements.

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Owning a gun should require the same things as owning a car. Obtaining a license, which would include passing a typical psychological exam as is used when enlisting in the Armed Forces, passing a background check for felonies and proving one could competently operate a firearm, followed by the registration of the firearm after proving one has obtained insurance coverage in case of it's accidental use.
Actually, none of the above are required to own a car. There's not even a minimum age to own a car. This is a fundamentally flawed arguement. However, I do agree with you that lunatics should not possess guns or cars for that matter.
__________________
2009 E320 Bluetec 117,000
1995 E300D 306,000 Sold
1996 Ford Taurus LX 130,000 Sold
1985 300TD Still 225,000 Sold
2016 Ford Fusion 24,900
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:04 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by connerm View Post
Actually, none of the above are required to own a car. There's not even a minimum age to own a car. This is a fundamentally flawed arguement. However, I do agree with you that lunatics should not possess guns or cars for that matter.
Hair splitter, I will correct it to say, drive a car. Perhaps you should own a gun without bullets.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:09 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwbuge View Post
A bunch of states now fall under or participate in Reciprocity Agreements.

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html
And due to the Chicago Decision, they will all eventually be found un-Constitutional. A state has no right to regulate anything granted to a citizen in the Bill of Rights, reiterated in the 14th Amendment:

Quote:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States
All state laws regarding gun ownership have essentially been found un-Constitutional:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._Chicago

something that those on the Right have been claiming to be a great victory, but as yet they have not understood the implications of it.

The SCOTUS just gave the Federal Gov't regulatory authority over the National Militia. If the Democrats ever attain a veto-proof majority, gun owners will rue the day.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by JollyRoger View Post
Hair splitter, I will correct it to say, drive a car. Perhaps you should own a gun without bullets.
Figured that since you were mincing the wording of the 2nd amendment, I’d suggest you fortify your car vs. gun argument.
__________________
2009 E320 Bluetec 117,000
1995 E300D 306,000 Sold
1996 Ford Taurus LX 130,000 Sold
1985 300TD Still 225,000 Sold
2016 Ford Fusion 24,900
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:13 PM
davidmash's Avatar
Supercalifragilisticexpia
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 58,131
I see no reason why a weapon should not have to be registered and presented by the owner once a year for inspection and proof that it is still in ones possession (just like a car). If you sell the weapon, you must transfer ownership to that individual (just like a car). If you loose a weapon or it gets stolen then you report it as such to local authorities (just like a car). I think that if gun ownership could be traced and you could not just sell guns behind closed doors things might improve a bit.

I would also like to see requirements for storing weapons as well. That would deal with the "my gun was stolen' issue. 2nd says that you can own a gun, not that it cannot be regulated.

May be while the republicans are 'clarifying' the 14th they can do it for the rest of the COTUS.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus

2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD**

- With out god, life is everything.
- God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson
- You can pray for me, I'll think for you.
- When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-10-2011, 12:16 PM
JollyRoger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 48
I am mincing no words, I am giving it to you utterly literal. Everyone has the right to possess a firearm. Every firearm owner is a potential soldier in the Militia. The government has a duty to see that it is well-regulated - and it says WHY in black and white: because this Militia is necessary to the security of The State. We do not need lunatics, felons and traitors in the National Militia, and so Congress can provide that this does not occur or is mitigated as much as possible. Since a lunatic, felon or traitor cannot conform to the regulations of the Militia, he forfeits his right to own a gun, as much as a felon forfeits his voting rights.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page