We must protect the children from Elton John's gay family.
 

I guess I need to cross Harps stores off my bucket list. They will sell a gossip rag that shows women in bikinis, has blatant lies about various stars on a regular basis but a loving gay family must be shielded from the young innocent children? How ass backward is that. Hey Arkansas, it's 2011. Come join the rest of the country.

Cover the children, there's gays on the magazine

He looks just like his father.

I bet their Nativity scenes of an unwed mother don't get covered up.

He is older than me! I can't imagine starting over again at my age. Oh well. He has the money to do it. I just don't understand why he would want to.

As to the OP. That is the bible belt in action. No sense to it but it is what it is. In my little local grocery they don't sell alcohol at all. Even the Wal Mart in a town 15 miles away they only sell beer.

Well, let's see: In the book of Genesis, He created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. See, that way, the WOMAN could bring forth CHILDREN. See, two same sex partners are unable to procreate. That's why homos are forced to adopt children created the old fashioned way. They don't appear to be complaining about it either.

If the entire world were homos, mankind would cease to exist very QUICKLY.

Unfortunately for that theory, book of Genesis is a work of fiction; but someone did know how to tell a good story to entertain the natives. :D

Following that fairy tale, we have a license for incest. I mean, if it starts from Adam and Eve and they have kids, who did the kids procreate with?

True. However if we had all of one thing, we might have issues. Kill off all the predators and the animals might overgrow.

That's one of the questions I used to pester the nuns with in Catechism. I even got a detention for it once for incessantly badgering them about it. By the 7th grade it was "suggested" that I might do better in public school.:D
I did.

So no answer about why incest was ok then but not now? What a ripoff. Think of all those people who want to boink their family members. :mad:

I guess it's a really good thing that the bible has nothing to do with US law and how things are run here.

Do you have anything else?

No it is not. The bible basically tells us that it's ok to have incestuous relationships. That would mean we will lose a lot of the redneck humor about a guy and his sister.

The pyramid has to start somewhere. And if she was hot.....

but due to the purity of the race as evidenced also by the long length of life, there were no adverse effects as we see happening today. Gradually, as the effects of sin took its toll on the human race, marrying one’s own sister, etc., began to create hereditary problems.

So sin changed the DNA so that the cells would reproduce so many times and die out as opposed to previously reproducing even more times? Sorry but lifespan is increasing. Oldest person was in 1875 according to wiki at 120 yrs and 164 days. Even that doesn't happen often.

Would it matter? That was the only girl you were getting so as they say, "Girls look better at closing time".