Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2011, 03:46 PM
benhogan's Avatar
CPA/Greasemonkey
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chapel Hill
Posts: 1,092
Leona as right- only the little people pay taxes

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/the-little-people-pay-taxes/?ref=business

very interesting piece on how taxes in the US are really hard on the low earners.

__________________
Ben
1987 190d 2.5Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2011, 04:04 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
I take it that it is other than federal income taxes?

Last edited by MTI; 02-23-2011 at 04:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2011, 04:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,126
The comments there offer some interesting insight on the author's analysis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2011, 04:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rockville MD
Posts: 833
Thats because its easier getting a thousand people to pay $1 each than getting a thousand dollars out of a millionaire.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles
2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed
2005 Toyota Sienna
2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible
1999 Toyota Tacoma
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-23-2011, 04:32 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Payroll contributions to SS are capped at a relatively low income level, as are the benefits that are eventually paid. If you want to increase both the contribution limit and the maximum benefit, that will work; but I suspect that most people who max out their contributions would be willing to opt out of the whole system anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-23-2011, 04:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,126
From the article:

The Little People Pay Taxes
By CATHERINE RAMPELL

Jennifer Graylock/Associated Press

Leona Helmsley, who reportedly said, “Only the little people pay taxes.”Leona Helmsley’s legacy lives on in the building that bears her name.

Over at tax.com, Martin A. Sullivan, an economist and contributing editor to Tax Analysts, has a fascinating post on the tax rates paid by the residents of the Helmsley Building. The building’s tax-evading billionaire namesake, as you may recall, supposedly once said, “Only the little people pay taxes.”

Mr. Sullivan shows that she was mostly right.

The building has its own ZIP code, and so Mr. Sullivan was able to use Internal Revenue Service ZIP code records to find data on the 130 individual tax returns filed by residents of the building in 2007. He then compared their tax liabilities to the estimated tax liabilities of the blue-collar workers employed by the building.

He found that the average adjusted gross income in the tax returns of building residents was $1.17 million. Which is of course impressive. More impressive, though, is the tax rates this group pays.

The table below shows the total income and payroll tax liability of a typical resident of the Helmsley building, alongside the same tax liabilities of janitors and security guards earning the average wages for the jobs in the New York area.

******************

Here's the interesting part:

The Building has it's own zip code. Yes, most giant commercial office buildings do. It's 35 stories tall and 2.3MM sf.

As far I can tell, nobody actually "lives" at 230 Park Ave. since there are only businesses that occupy the building.

The "130 individual tax returns" are probably small business owners filing as sole proprietorships. I wonder what the true revenues were, after businesses expenses or deductions (how much was capital gains income).

The author is not making a fair assessment of his argument, but rather wishes to present an agenda/perspective many willingly lap up!

Last edited by el presidente; 02-23-2011 at 05:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2011, 06:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
The revenues were likely much higher, would make the tax paid percentage even lower.
And I doubt the individuals were sole proprieters, more likely they were principals in LLCs, just to get the deductions for healthcare insurance if nothing else.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:07 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
The kind of income also hurts you, earned income, IE a job is the worst kind in regards to taxes.

People who earn a lot usually tend not to get W2's at the end of the year. They usualy own businesses and as a result have more write offs and the ability to a certain extent to determine there level of income. IE come the end of the year if I have a house closing I can push the date around to decide when to take the hit. My last one I pushed to January so I don't have to pay taxes on that money until April of 2011. Every business is different but right now I rather keep every cent as long as possible and push the tax hit off as long as I can.

SS is the biggest drag, I would love to opt out of that system. I have a feeling that most productive people would since they could reinvest that money at a far greater yield.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
SS is the biggest drag, I would love to opt out of that system. I have a feeling that most productive people would since they could reinvest that money at a far greater yield.
What would you opt into; a fund run by Bernie Maddoff?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:18 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
No I'd buy more property or possible some equipment with it. The ROI is far higher than SS which for my generation will be zero or pretty close.

$12k a year is enough to buy a Ford F550, or a little excavator. With some equipment I could do some of the site work myself on the simple houses, say 2-3 a year @ $10k a pop. Far better use of the money than the black hole known as SS.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
No I'd buy more property or possible some equipment with it. The ROI is far higher than SS which for my generation will be zero or pretty close.

$12k a year is enough to buy a Ford F550, or a little excavator. With some equipment I could do some of the site work myself on the simple houses, say 2-3 a year @ $10k a pop. Far better use of the money than the black hole known as SS.
SS isn't a black hole. There are many workers in this country that benefit from a stable and predictable source of retirement funds. And you will get back, with interest, every cent you paid into SS.
Not everyone, in fact I think most people, do not have the ambition, time, or skills you seem to have.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-23-2011, 08:47 PM
buffa98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Amish Country, PA
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chas H View Post
SS isn't a black hole. There are many workers in this country that benefit from a stable and predictable source of retirement funds. And you will get back, with interest, every cent you paid into SS.
Not everyone, in fact I think most people, do not have the ambition, time, or skills you seem to have.

If my memory is correct it is capped at $95,000. As a self employed person would pay $13,110 in SS taxes. Given the return on investment of roughly 1500 a month (maxed out) this person would have to live to 95 to break even. SS is a black hole for anyone who is right at 100k.

My opinion.
__________________
86 300SDL. 250,xxx on #14 Head. One eye always on temp gauge.. Cruising towards 300K
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-23-2011, 09:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by buffa98 View Post
If my memory is correct it is capped at $95,000. As a self employed person would pay $13,110 in SS taxes. Given the return on investment of roughly 1500 a month (maxed out) this person would have to live to 95 to break even. SS is a black hole for anyone who is right at 100k.

My opinion.
What would be the return if someone invested in Bernie Maddoff? Or became disabled at age 55? I'm not claiming SS is perfect but it's a good hedge against unforseen circumstances.
Could you expand your example of a self-employed earning over $95K. How many years for instance and the average income of those self employed.
I'm quite curious about your figures since I was self employed for almost 30 years.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-23-2011, 09:32 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Well I disagree, the figures don't work out its going to be bankrupt unless drastic changes are made long before I retire.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-23-2011, 09:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beautiful Bucks Co, PA
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
Well I disagree, the figures don't work out its going to be bankrupt unless drastic changes are made long before I retire.
The changes needed to keep SS funded are not drastic. Right now SS is funded until 2037. Increasing the cut -off for SS contributions and a means test for receipt of benefits will keep SS going well past your time.
Something that could be done right now, but likely won't, is to buy t-bills with your SS tax. Such a purchase would give one a good steady and secure return on investment.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page