|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Not a Fan of Wide Computer Screens
My new PC and my work system have the wide format monitors, and while at first I thought they were new and cool, I'm starting to dislike them for every day work.
There's too much dead space, the fonts have to be smaller to maintain proportion, and there's a lot of mousing around to get from one side to the other. The only plus I can think of is for watching movies, and then split screen applications which I don't do. So I closed up the PC and plugged in my old 4:3 monitor, and I'm much happier! I guess I'm old fashioned.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Has a lot to do with the quality of the monitor and the video driver you have loaded. Some monitors will only have a sharp picture at their smallest resolution. Others will work well at several different settings. Also, some drivers will not support the resolution you want. Best to go online and load the latest driver for your video card/chip. We have bought some cheap monitors here and it is tough setting them up for the users to be able to see
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Not a fan of the wide screen TV's either.
But, try and find a decent 4:3 anymore................. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I still dig the 4:3 format for a lot of computer work.
A couple of years ago, I picked up a pair of Dell 20" 4:3 monitors (native resolution 1600 x 1200) from a local software developer secondhand . Very nice! If I had the room, I'd be running them both side-by-side. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to what Bab mentioned. If yo do go back to your wide monitor, you can use Ctrl + or Ctrl - to increase and decrease your screen size fora easier reading. As for te mouse, you can go to your control panel and adjust the speed of your cursor so that it will move across the screen with less mouse movement.
Just some ideas.
__________________
Sent from an agnostic abacus 2014 C250 21,XXX my new DD ** 2013 GLK 350 18,000 Wife's new DD** - With out god, life is everything. - God is an ever receding pocket of scientific ignorance that's getting smaller and smaller as time moves on..." Neil DeGrasse Tyson - You can pray for me, I'll think for you. - When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Many 16:9 monitors I come across now actually have a rotating mount that lets you turn it 90 deg. If you deal with long columns rather than many rows, this may be a good option for you.
When you rotate the monitor, you have to go into the video properties and turn on the "rotate" feature and flip the screen to match the monitor.
__________________
-Evan Benz Fleet: 1968 UNIMOG 404.114 1998 E300 2008 E63 Non-Benz Fleet: 1992 Aerostar 1993 MR2 2000 F250 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Here at the paper, the page designers use the wide screens flipped. That way they can see a whole page at once.
At my desk in IT, I run three 20' monitors side by side by side. Gives me one screen for the helpdesk (I have to fix things), one for email (ditto) and the center one for everything else (like PP). I do run a rotateable at home and like it. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Going wide without going big (24" or larger) on a desktop can be frustrating.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
In the Printing and Sign business, a large monitor is great.
__________________
For the Saved, this world is the worst it will ever get. For the unSaved, this world is the best it will ever get. Clk's Ebay Stuff BUY SOMETHING NOW!!! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As much as I like the 4:3 format for some stuff, I do have some applications where the user interface works well with a left/right split. For that, a 24" wide screen (1920 x 1200) does the job for me. A 20" 4:3 (1600 x 1200) complements it nicely in a dual-monitor setup. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
When our company upgraded everyone to the widescreen flat panels, I specifically requested two of the 4:3 aspect monitors that were being retired.
I use them as dual monitors and get way more done than if I had a single widescreen...
__________________
2009 ML350 (106K) - Family vehicle 2001 CLK430 Cabriolet (80K) - Wife's car 2005 BMW 645CI (138K) - My daily driver 2016 Mustang (32K) - Daughter's car |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
It took me a while to get used to my 16:9 screen but now I love it. I don't even use my old 4:3, its just sitting around even though its a good LCD. I think the change came about when my work laptop was exchanged for a newer one with a 16:9 screen (I had no option), I found working with spreadsheets much easier since I could see the rows further across and didn't have to side scroll nearly as much.
__________________
TC Current stable: - 2004 Mazda RALLYWANKEL - 2007 Saturn sky redline - 2004 Explorer...under surgery. Past: 135i, GTI, 300E, 300SD, 300SD, Stealth |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Seems like size matters, in this case. I briefly tried the vertical orientation today and its interesting, but it cuts off the right side of some of our web apps. Its nice for running Linux telnet though. So a combination of a wide screen and a square one seems to be the way to go, if you have the space for it.
__________________
1985 380SE Blue/Blue - 230,000 miles 2012 Subaru Forester 5-speed 2005 Toyota Sienna 2004 Chrysler Sebring convertible 1999 Toyota Tacoma |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I use two wide-screens rotated to give me an (approx) 2000 x 2000.
I then run 4 virtual desktops. |
Bookmarks |
|
|