BillyBob Wants to Kill the Pretty Girls Thread

[tonkovich]

Originally Posted by Botnst

Read through this thread and count the number of insults directed at Mr Bob vs his barbs directed elsewhere.

Hint: There is no parity.

birds of a feather, flock together?

oh, ayn, you are so predictable.

[Botnst]

Originally Posted by tonkovich

birds of a feather, flock together?

oh, ayn, you are so predictable.

Ahem.

[PaulC]

Alright, that made me laugh.

[TylerH860]

Originally Posted by engatwork

Thanks for the support.

Yes much appreciated.

[Billybob]

Just an observation on something that was revealed earlier this evening. I’d have posted it in the original thread but it’s been locked and this thread is related.

Sometime earlier on Oct 10 before 11:15 PM when the first mention of it remains, sjh started deleting and altering his postings after having moderators find him in violation of the TOU copy right provisions. Early the next morning at 05:42 AM the person who the day before instigated the TOU copy right complaint had read the posts that had been going on about it including Kerry’s “All recent posts or just posts on this thread?” which he quotes and posted this:

RNC heckes thread post #770

“My observation is that Mr. SJH's threads had become increasingly trollish lately. He tries very hard to come off as reasoned and reasonable but it seems difficult to walk that line.

Taking your toys or posts and leaving may be a reaction in frustration of not being able to get folks to agree with your point of view.

I have come to the place where I have accepted that nobody gives a Shyte what I think.

Of course I am happy to reciprocate.”

So first he complains to the moderators which ends with sjh deleting and leaving and then posts as if:

1) he has no idea what has transpired
2) suggests sjh may have crossed some line
3) that deleting posts was due to a failure to find agreement
4) claims no one cares about what he (Tom) posts, and that he is happy to respond in kind

When the fact is he more than anybody except the moderators knew what had started this train of events and that it was his deliberate action. That there was no substantive issue with what sjh had posted and if anything it was a dubious technical violation of a flawed rule notice that he had authored and there was no trolling or crossing of any line. He knew that is was his own frustration at not being able to get sjh to agree with his point of view that lead to him reporting the complaint. That in fact contrary to what he publicly stated and tried to convince everyone of, he very much was concerned what someone else thinks and was perfectly willing to hide behind the anonymity of the report to the moderator system while attempting to abuse the TOU provisions in order to inflict some harm and distress on a forum member with whom he disagreed. There has been no evidence revealed that suggests any across the forum concern regarding copy right compliance on his part.

[jt20]

ahhh ha..


I see. So was it Colonel Mustard, or Mrs. Scarlet in the Observatory with the candlestick?

Maybe you'll finally earn that doctorate when you're done with this dissertation. AH

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

Just an observation on something that was revealed earlier this evening. I’d have posted it in the original thread but it’s been locked and this thread is related.

Sometime earlier on Oct 10 before 11:15 PM when the first mention of it remains, sjh started deleting and altering his postings after having moderators find him in violation of the TOU copy right provisions. Early the next morning at 05:42 AM the person who the day before instigated the TOU copy right complaint had read the posts that had been going on about it including Kerry’s “All recent posts or just posts on this thread?” which he quotes and posted this:

RNC heckes thread post #770

“My observation is that Mr. SJH's threads had become increasingly trollish lately. He tries very hard to come off as reasoned and reasonable but it seems difficult to walk that line.

Taking your toys or posts and leaving may be a reaction in frustration of not being able to get folks to agree with your point of view.

I have come to the place where I have accepted that nobody gives a Shyte what I think.

Of course I am happy to reciprocate.”

So first he complains to the moderators which ends with sjh deleting and leaving and then posts as if:

1) he has no idea what has transpired
2) suggests sjh may have crossed some line
3) that deleting posts was due to a failure to find agreement
4) claims no one cares about what he (Tom) posts, and that he is happy to respond in kind

When the fact is he more than anybody except the moderators knew what had started this train of events and that it was his deliberate action. That there was no substantive issue with what sjh had posted and if anything it was a dubious technical violation of a flawed rule notice that he had authored and there was no trolling or crossing of any line. He knew that is was his own frustration at not being able to get sjh to agree with his point of view that lead to him reporting the complaint. That in fact contrary to what he publicly stated and tried to convince everyone of, he very much was concerned what someone else thinks and was perfectly willing to hide behind the anonymity of the report to the moderator system while attempting to abuse the TOU provisions in order to inflict some harm and distress on a forum member with whom he disagreed. There has been no evidence revealed that suggests any across the forum concern regarding copy right compliance on his part.

WGAS?

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by PaulC

WGAS?

Why'd you post in response?

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

Why'd you post in response?

I knew that you would appreciate some constructive feedback.

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by Brian Carlton

I'm quite comfortable in retirement, but thanks for asking..............

It's quite interesting that the significantly greater tolerance possessed by the current moderators is still insufficient for certain individuals and they perpetually must find ways to attack the staff.

I'm convinced that the moderation is not the problem.............the pleasure is garnered via the perpetual bashing............. a clear sign of a tiny ego that is not satisfied in a more productive way.

Despite your commentary while seeking refuge and succor over at BenzWorld after your dismissal, how could they not appreciate that you've come to recognizes and acknowledge their abilities!

“After getting slapped in the face for doing the correct job and slapped again after my departure, they can go pound sand.
My work is done.
I get to sit back and watch a train wreck in slow motion.
The first car already went off the rails tonight”.

“A new team, clueless by definition, attempting to learn to walk, without the benefit of a parent, with the dictum of not using the stick
Watching it from afar is better than a new movie...................”

“He's just a very good troll and is taking full advantage of the new moderators. They don't view him as a troll. Hell two of them are trying to have a rational discussion with him.
Instead of booting the troll, they go after those that attack the troll. Craig sent me an e-mail about it.
The troll wins.”

“Yep, but they seem to be of the new "inclusive" moderation style where any troll is accepted.
I did the best I could to eliminate the trolls...............made for a much better forum.
They've also eliminated the public display of any infractions or warnings, so the forum membership has no idea where the "line" might be. Allows them to move "the line" at will. It's a lousy way to moderate, IMHO, moderating in the shadows.............so nobody knows............”

“There remain quite a few disgruntled folks over here who won't forget the arbitrary nature of the site back in 2004.
I'm afraid the arbitrary part of the moderation will be back in force as I speak.”

[10fords]

Billybob- if you want to kill the Pretty Girls thread you must surely be gay, so you can say or do whatever you want, as anyone who disagrees with you is obviously a bigot/homophobe/ignorant hater. All I can say is that if you succeed in killing the Pretty girls thread then you are just an *******, even if you don't pork other men.

[tonkovich]

Originally Posted by Billybob

Despite your commentary while seeking refuge and succor over at BenzWorld after your dismissal, how could they not appreciate that you've come to recognizes and acknowledge their abilities!

“After getting slapped in the face for doing the correct job and slapped again after my departure, they can go pound sand.
My work is done.
I get to sit back and watch a train wreck in slow motion.
The first car already went off the rails tonight”.

“A new team, clueless by definition, attempting to learn to walk, without the benefit of a parent, with the dictum of not using the stick
Watching it from afar is better than a new movie...................”

“He's just a very good troll and is taking full advantage of the new moderators. They don't view him as a troll. Hell two of them are trying to have a rational discussion with him.
Instead of booting the troll, they go after those that attack the troll. Craig sent me an e-mail about it.
The troll wins.”

“Yep, but they seem to be of the new "inclusive" moderation style where any troll is accepted.
I did the best I could to eliminate the trolls...............made for a much better forum.
They've also eliminated the public display of any infractions or warnings, so the forum membership has no idea where the "line" might be. Allows them to move "the line" at will. It's a lousy way to moderate, IMHO, moderating in the shadows.............so nobody knows............”

“There remain quite a few disgruntled folks over here who won't forget the arbitrary nature of the site back in 2004.
I'm afraid the arbitrary part of the moderation will be back in force as I speak.”

exactly how many times have you been banned?and how many infractions do you have at the moment?

asked only in the interest of the honesty you seem to be wishing of others.

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by tonkovich

exactly how many times have you been banned?and how many infractions do you have at the moment?

asked only in the interest of the honesty you seem to be wishing of others.

What does how many times I've been banned have to do with honesty? Similarly what does any amount of present infractions mean? Can you count? You could look at the little sqiggly lines that most people recognize as Arabic numerals and answer that question for yourself.

Are you implying that lying is a violation of the forum rules or a banning offence?

[PaulC]

Originally Posted by Billybob

What does how many times I've been banned have to do with honesty? Similarly what does any amount of present infractions mean? Can you count? You could look at the little sqiggly lines that most people recognize as Arabic numerals and answer that question for yourself.

Are you implying that lying is a violation of the forum rules or a banning offence?

He may be searching for a motive behind all this commentary from you regarding past and current Open Discussion moderators who have sent you to your room without supper in the past.

[Billybob]

Originally Posted by 10fords

Billybob- if you want to kill the Pretty Girls thread you must surely be gay, so you can say or do whatever you want, as anyone who disagrees with you is obviously a bigot/homophobe/ignorant hater. All I can say is that if you succeed in killing the Pretty girls thread then you are just an *******, even if you don't pork other men.

Oh! Yeah! Who's hatin' now! I was born this way!

Lady Gaga - Born This Way - YouTube