Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-22-2012, 10:54 AM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
According to B.O., it's the Repubs who are blocking Keystone XL

B.O.'s press secretary yesterday claims that it's all the Republicans fault that the Keystone XL is not going through. Since gas prices will soon be a hot potato, it's time for him to earn his paycheck and do a little spin!

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:24 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
I think after 3 exhaustive environmental impact studies all giving the thumbs up was enough to convince the GOP that Obama should sign off on it, but Obama found 3 studies just wasn't quite enough and faulted the GOP for their insistence on relying on flawed studies already approved by his own state department.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:42 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudesky View Post
I think after 3 exhaustive environmental impact studies all giving the thumbs up was enough to convince the GOP that Obama should sign off on it, but Obama found 3 studies just wasn't quite enough and faulted the GOP for their insistence on relying on flawed studies already approved by his own state department.
Any hint that some of those analyses were not performed by impartial parties?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:45 AM
MS Fowler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Littlestown PA ( 6 miles south of Gettysburg)
Posts: 2,278
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulC View Post
Any hint that some of those analyses were not performed by impartial parties?
Are there any impartial parties?
__________________
1982 300SD " Wotan" ..On the road as of Jan 8, 2007 with Historic Tags
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:50 AM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Are there any impartial parties?
Says the forum member seeking an unbiased media.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS Fowler View Post
Are there any impartial parties?
If one of your major clients is a pipeline company that will directly benefit from the pipeline, then perhaps you may have a bit of a conflict of interest.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTI View Post
Says the forum member seeking an unbiased media.
Ow!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-22-2012, 11:57 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulC View Post
Any hint that some of those analyses were not performed by impartial parties?
Like it matters?

Anti-Keystone pipeline activists need new target - Bill Mann's Canada - MarketWatch
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
C Span had a hearing about a month ago that included testimony from a Nebraska rancher who opposed the pipeline on environmental grounds. He was persuasive about the risks to, among other things, ground water in his area should the pipeline have a spill. That potential cost is balanced by what actual benefit? The benefits are huge for the companies involved, but I don't see any huge benefit to the country, and certainly no benefit to Nebraska ranchers.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:06 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
C Span had a hearing about a month ago that included testimony from a Nebraska rancher who opposed the pipeline on environmental grounds. He was persuasive about the risks to, among other things, ground water in his area should the pipeline have a spill. That potential cost is balanced by what actual benefit? The benefits are huge for the companies involved, but I don't see any huge benefit to the country, and certainly no benefit to Nebraska ranchers.

Hmm... no benefit to the country? You would think that someone who posts on an automotive discussion forum would be a driver. Furthermore, you would think that a driver would be noticing gasoline prices.

The Keystone pipeline will be going through my place and I want nothing more than to see that NOT happen. That said, the pipeline would supply much needed crude and 13,000, albeit temporary, jobs. No benefit?
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,292
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible View Post
Hmm... no benefit to the country? You would think that someone who posts on an automotive discussion forum would be a driver. Furthermore, you would think that a driver would be noticing gasoline prices.

The Keystone pipeline will be going through my place and I want nothing more than to see that NOT happen. That said, the pipeline would supply much needed crude and 13,000, albeit temporary, jobs. No benefit?
I didn't say no benefit. There are clear benefits from the pipeline. I'm not convinced they outweigh the costs. I not convinced either way.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:27 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sharing my mother's basement with several liberals who can't hold a job.
Posts: 33,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
C Span had a hearing about a month ago that included testimony from a Nebraska rancher who opposed the pipeline on environmental grounds. He was persuasive about the risks to, among other things, ground water in his area should the pipeline have a spill. That potential cost is balanced by what actual benefit? The benefits are huge for the companies involved, but I don't see any huge benefit to the country, and certainly no benefit to Nebraska ranchers.

How has it worked out in Alaska?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:38 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Honus View Post
I didn't say no benefit. There are clear benefits from the pipeline. I'm not convinced they outweigh the costs. I not convinced either way.

Fair enough and an honest answer!
__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 254
Notorious capitalist chimes in: Stop Keystone pipeline before it's too late - CNN.com
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:09 PM
Posting since Jan 2000
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,166
So even far left wing tipper Crayon Ted believes in NIMBY!

__________________
2001 SLK 320 six speed manual
2014 Porsche Cayenne six speed manual

Annoy a Liberal, Read the Constitution
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page