Truth. :)

Of course you remember the ultra right wing nut job named Boneheaddoctor?

This hypocrite hired a pair of Mexican workers and paid them a low amount of money to do some work on his house.

Of course, he's also not too brilliant because he let this information slip on the forum.

When we finished with him, there was nothing but a castrated shell.

I'm absolutely sure we would find the same hypocrisy if we did some investigation of you.

Reduced to threats now..

Some of the soft spined members on here would be standing on their chairs screaming for a moderator.

That's because they cannot handle the truth. Apparently, neither can you.

This statement speaks volumes. Apparently you do not read your own sig quotes.

Its the internet not the mafia, Capone.

This statement speaks nothing.

My sig quote is written specially for you.

The question is not whether Mitt is good at making money. The question is whether he as president would do anything that would benefit ordinary working people like us.

For me the answer is clear. He would not.....on purpose.;)

Yeah, you're right, it's 3.1 million according to the article. Nobody said that charitable giving was bad. What I said was that whoever copied and pasted the original piece should have done some fact checking.

Silly. That would preclude the posting of most of the material on OD.
Have some fun and don't take things so seriously. LOL!

Don't take things seriously around this place, you must be new here. :P

And you think the continuing the current administration will benefit you?

No, it is a false that Romney gave only 3.1 million!

The basis of that falsehood has been exposed in my post #43. It is the result of a poster relying upon his inaccurate and incomplete understanding of the incomplete reporting of his preferred biased source.

The original statement of the OP was:

Kerry's statement falsely claimed that Romney only gave 2.6 million and further implied that fact checking hadn't been done or was lacking by someone, based on his calculations and the source he provided.

The basis of that falsehood has been exposed in my post #43. It is the result of a poster relying upon his incomplete understanding of the incomplete reporting of his preferred biased source.

Mitt Romney claimed charitable donations of $4,020,572 on his 2011 Federal Income tax return! There is no evidence to suggest that the IRS or any body else has raised any question regarding the truthfullness of Romney's claim made and signed under the pains and penalties of purjury.

The original source material is Romney's 2011 Federal Income tax filing here:

https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/heraldextra.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/f/a0/fa0cb20e-46af-11e1-afa8-0019bb2963f4/4f1ee8cea0b96.pdf.pdf&chrome=true

The OP's original information regarding Romney's 2011 charitable contribution was absolutely accurate and any accusation that is was anything other than absolutely accurate is completely unsupported and false, and derived at based on faulty reasoning and biased, obfuscative, and incomplete reporting!

$4,020,572 is precisely "over 4 million"!

When the fact is the truth, fact checking can only confirm the truth!

When a fact is true fact checking can only confirm the truth!

The OP copied and pasted a 100% true and accurate fact regarding Romney's 2011 charitable donations that any competent fact checker could have and would have easily have verified as "100% true and accurate", if they ever had any intention of doing so in the first place!

If someone with an intent at fact disputing and under the guise of fact checking employed faulty reasoning and biased information they could very well arrive at some other conclusion which is not true.

Two facts that might bear on this missive....

The first is that every Latter Day Saint Stake is run by a Bishop and all of them are unpaid. The rank of Bishop is something that all Mormon men strive for and work towards and once you are there it cannot be taken away but by the LDS system its' self. I think it is nice that Romney attained Bishop status, but he was not responsible for other churches, or Stakes, like an Bishop in another denomination would be. He would have been responsible for the Stake he went to.

On getting into Harvard.... I knew a guy in the early 90's who applied to Harvard. He grew up in China where his Parents were Missionaries and spoke not only the main language there but, since his Parents moved around a lot, several dialects. He was also President of his High School Class and had a number of academic awards.

His cost for school was going to be paid for by money his Parents had saved for years and years just for his education. When he found he was accepted he was shocked to find he was also awarded a 100% full ride. He had inquired into if any financial help were possible but he was never expecting this.

It turns out that a Professor there needed an assistant for a China language project he was working on and he needed someone who spoke perfect Chinese, who could also read it, and who spoke perfect English. So he was in the right place at the right time.

So it can take place, and it probably does more than anyone would realize.

This guy's story has nothing to do with Obama's except that maybe Obama was in the right place at the right time as well.

What I never knew about Mitt, is that he's the guy that wants to make America more like...America.