cmbdiesel |
07-29-2012 09:23 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by greazzer
(Post 2981564)
Well, it is an honest question when I started this post and I never heard of this issue until the day I started this post as well. What did I learn ?
B.O. went by and used the name B.S. He (his parents) may have legally changed his name to B.S. I could not find any legal proceeding to change his name back if this occurred. This was not in the lame stream media, or maybe I was asleep at the switch. This topic can be charged with controversy and many folks do get fired up over it. I am not sure why, however. I learned that many folks have either assumed or have conjecture that he used this name a lot more than when he was a child, but no one really knows one way or another. There are posts out there which could be hoaxes. I learned that many folks directed me to the "hoaxes", but I do not think they simply said this was in fact B.O.'s name. Instead, the waters were muddied with the argued hoaxes and the so-called leads and tips. Why direct someone to an alleged hoax versus the "facts" is beyond me. And yes, we as Americans have been shut out from a lot of records that most political figures are "forced" to cough up -- except B.S. I wonder why.
|
One man's hoax is another's fact... apparently:rolleyes:
Still have not seen anything posted besides hearsay.
If you have facts, then post them.
"may have", "cannot find", "assumed", "conjecture"... these are all I'm seeing here.
As for the supposed sealed records, you (and others) postulate that there is a grand plan to keep Obama's records private, do you have quantifiable comparative information that shows this??
Show me where other president's records were available and Obama's are not.
When one makes an assertion, it is customary to have supporting evidence, so, let's see it.
|