|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why we should not go to war...
The election is taking up lots of media time.
But lets not forget about North Korea and Chinese increasing tensions with Japan. China - Hell March - the largest army in the world - FULL (Official) - YouTube This is why I think we should never go to war with China. The American people have not the slightest grasp about what kind of war Japan is dragging us towards. Right now and since WW2 we have fought nothing but piss ant army's really. I don't think the American public can absorb the number of causalities fighting a real army will cause.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
China ZTZ 99 MBT on City Road - YouTube
This is what cities who don't properly tote the party line get, and what we would be facing. Not BS Republican Guard units. Highly trained and fanatical tank units with equipment on the level of any countries today. Ie they are going to pop Abrams like we pop theirs, no one sided battles.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
When the time is right...China will make it's move.
At that time the West will be nothing more than an Ant facing a Dragon. Believe that.
__________________
CHILCUTT~ The secret to a long life. Is knowing when it is time to leave. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Only one way you could muster the personnel necessary to fight that war - and if BO even whispered the word "draft", his approval ratings would end up making Congress look good by comparison. Canada would become a VERY popular tourist destination amongst the 18 - 35 age group once again. I don't think the powers that be in both countries would allow it to come to the point of us getting into a war with China - in short, it'd be bad for business - fiscally and economically - not only would it tank our two economies, but probably drag the rest of the world down with us as well. Besides, from what I can gather perusing some foreign news outlets, BO is a little preoccupied with Libya and Syria right now - as in we've been doing a little old-fashioned gun running via Libya thru Turkey into Syria - problem is, a goodly portion of the arms we're sending, including Stinger missles, is ending up in the hands of our old "friends" from Al-Queada - who seem to coincidentally make up a good portion of the "freedom fighters" in Syria - and that Turkey is basically giving them safe haven, allowing them to train and reequip at a base inside Turkey - and that the government forces had managed to capture some "advisors" from a certain outfit, that used to go by the name of Blackwater. Ooops. Perhaps that has something to do with the cryptic comment about the good general not testifying at the Benghazi hearings - why bother mentioning that, when he's ostensibly resigning because of an extramarital affair?
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel Mitchell Oates Mooresville, NC '87 300D 212K miles '87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08 '05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The desertification of China Quote:
__________________
1986 300SDL, 362K 1984 300D, 138K Last edited by cmac2012; 11-11-2012 at 03:11 AM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
We are their market, they will protect us unlike anything you've ever seen.
__________________
On some nights I still believe that a car with the fuel gauge on empty can run about fifty more miles if you have the right music very loud on the radio. - HST 1983 300SD - 305000 1984 Toyota Landcruiser - 190000 1994 GMC Jimmy - 203000 https://media.giphy.com/media/X3nnss8PAj5aU/giphy.gif |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Never say Never...
__________________
CHILCUTT~ The secret to a long life. Is knowing when it is time to leave. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Also, with expanding their view 25-40 years out...at which-Singapore are masters at. I am sure that some interest in building either canal's or pipelines have been discussed to tackle this issue.
__________________
CHILCUTT~ The secret to a long life. Is knowing when it is time to leave. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
China is already buying land where ever they can.
Japan has little or no natural resources so its of little long term use. They will just slowly take over big biz & avoid bloodshed.
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort.... 1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket. 1980 300D now parts car 800k miles 1984 300D 500k miles 1987 250td 160k miles English import 2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles 1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo. 1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion. Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
China, without discussion with its neighbors, has dammed the Mekong and tributaries and other rivers that exit it's boundaries. This has resulted in throttling the river and lowering availability to Indochina. Those countries are terrified. Also, Chinese claims on the offshore hydrocarbons hs put it in direct conflict with similar claims from Taiwan, Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Some people claim China has no territorial ambitions. Poppycock, say the Tibetans. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
If there is ever a war between the US and China. China will win it without ever firing a shot*. They know that to try and match us with wasteful military spending is a fool's errand. They might pretend to do so, but only to make us spend like crazy. They will beat us with trade. We won't be beaten so much as we just won't have the same level of prosperity or trade. The way they will do that is to copy our tech, use it to train a generation of engineers (done), and then begin improving upon it (next on the agenda). But even if your hypothesis (of a fearsome Chinese military) were true (maybe someday); I can not see our country shy-ing away from a fight due to cowardice, even in the case of overwhelming odds.
__________________
Remember, Safety Third! '99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yeah, even though it sort of goes against my previous post, I'd agree that the smaller countries in southeast Asia (the ones nobody really cares about) have reason to worry. I still don't see military invasion happening though. I'd expect economic / resource deprivation as you've alluded to.
__________________
Remember, Safety Third! '99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Winning economic wars between larger adversaries seems to be the way it will be to me. At the current time the chinese are learning the game.
One should consider this as not that bad of a bloodless option.Still very serious at the same time. There are too many inherent variables with this approach but it seems workable in general to me overall. Smaller wars will continue with countries that have little chance of participation in economic battles. Those to me are basically more political type or ideology based fights. Economically they are a disaster except for those manufacturing the weapons and amunition to enable them. If you are economically powerful enough you can indirectly or otherwise at least buy control of an external entity. You do not have to annex it by force. This gets into the area of needing structural changes to pre empt economic shifts of a major type overall. In my opinion this is perhaps a major lacking in todays political management of north america. There are too many uncertainties of where things are headed otherwise. Structural changes to prevent things of an undesired nature occuring over the long haul to me are not a bad ideal. At this time there is quite a bit of flak in Canada about the government not allowing chinese takeover of segments of the internal energy sector. The chinese are seeking control of them currently. My first awareness of this is when I picked up that the chinese had pumped 10 billion initially into one element our energy sector. I think they are prepared to invest hundreds of billions into it at this time to own and control it. If it were acomplished it would be too late to stop. I have to wonder what their eventual designs are on the american marketplace. Politically if it makes jobs may tilt the balance to allow it.. I would suggest forget the ideal of physical wars between superpowers. What may be waged soon enough as an economic war wil present enough stress to go around for almost all. The constantly accumulating federal debt load should make it easier for them as well. I would also expect a major wave of immigration to run their various enterprises at some point. Certainly there would be some benifit to north america. Still fundementally the important aspects of control and profit will be more externally benificial in nature than internally. North america may have played this game for a long time. Others may be better at it now or their approach is different enough to prevail. Last edited by barry12345; 11-11-2012 at 12:44 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
OTOH, shyte happens. Let's say we had a massive volcanic event in the vicinity of Krakatoa that resulted in vomiting a cloud of ash that encircles the globe for 2-3 years. This would shorted the growing season in temperate climates. This would result in worldwide food shortages. A country with a billion people to feed and little arable land would be under significant pressure to get food. They would seek food from places that have it. Abrupt, short-term climate disasters have happened before: Year Without a Summer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia It could happen again, tomorrow. In that circumstance our linear thinking would collapse, models would be useless and we would likely enter a decade of military conflict around the world. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Flak? Keeping the chingalingdingdongs from controlling strategic industries is one of the smartest things that the Canadian gov't is doing. If only the US could be as smart. Not having H-bombs to glassify their major cities, the Canadians need to resort to other, less-violent means of self-protection.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|