|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mars probe landing tonight
If they lost this one too (three to many failures), there’s something there they don’t want us to know about…
(no inside information just a guess).Thai GI sends…
__________________
GI but not GI Joe They call me "The Thai GI" Thai in the US Arsenal |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Imagine the engineering challenge . . surviving a launch, exiting the gravitational pull of Earth, traversing space, decelerating from 1,200 miles per hour to 0 mph in six minutes, which includes hovering on retro rockets 40-50 feet off the surface, then bouncing in airbags for a few kilometers! Wow.
Last edited by MTI; 01-03-2004 at 02:11 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
MTI, given the truth of your analysis, what are the chances of a safe launch, landing, return launch, return landing of human beings?
If it's 1/3 chance for one-way robots would it be 1/9 for round-trip? I'll bet not. I'll bet the chance of a successful return trip would be much, much lower. The return vehicle must remain viable after decceleration, near-crash landing, then be able to properly re-ignite for the return leg. There are many people who find the current shuttle failure rate unacceptible. If we improved the failure from the current martian success rate for each leg to say... the shuttle rate (2% catastrophic failure) for a round trip, would it be okay to send manned vessels? Botnst |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
As a believer in "the right stuff" a manned landing would have higher rates of success than robotic, but the challenge there is the scale/payload size necessary for manned missions with life support and safety systems. Unmanned vehicles are smaller, have less redundant systems and are, by naturel, expendable. So, for "bang for the buck" unmanned is the way to go for now.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Martian International Public Radio System today announced that the glow in the sky was a weather balloon NOT an unidentified flying object as rumored by the local citizens. All has been reported quiet in the sky in Martian Area 51. Good Luck NASA.
__________________
Paul |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
BBC says safe landing
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: 2014 VW Tiguan SEL 4Motion 43,000 miles. 2016 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport (wife's). Past: 2006 Jetta TDI 135,970 miles. Sold Nov. '13. 1995 E-320 Special Edition. 220,200 miles. Sold Sept. '07. 1987 190-E 16 valve. 153,000 miles. Sold Feb. '06. 1980 300-D 225,000 miles. Donated to the National Kidney Foundation. 1980 240-D manual, 297,500 miles. Totaled by inattentive driver. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spock! Are you napping........
William Rogers........ |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wonder if it has any vacuum controls
- pun intended.
__________________
Jim |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Damn, I can't find my foil hat!
![]() Mike
__________________
_____ 1979 300 SD 350,000 miles _____ 1982 300D-gone---sold to a buddy _____ 1985 300TD 270,000 miles _____ 1994 E320 not my favorite, but the wife wanted it www.myspace.com/mikemover www.myspace.com/openskystudio www.myspace.com/speedxband www.myspace.com/openskyseparators www.myspace.com/doubledrivemusic |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just caught it on the news, it made it!!! Congrats NASA!
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|