Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > General Discussions > Off-Topic Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2004, 01:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Currently assigned @ Travis AFB, CA
Posts: 165
Mars probe landing tonight

If they lost this one too (three to many failures), there’s something there they don’t want us to know about… (no inside information just a guess).

Thai GI sends…

__________________
GI but not GI Joe
They call me "The Thai GI"
Thai in the US Arsenal
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2004, 01:23 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
Imagine the engineering challenge . . surviving a launch, exiting the gravitational pull of Earth, traversing space, decelerating from 1,200 miles per hour to 0 mph in six minutes, which includes hovering on retro rockets 40-50 feet off the surface, then bouncing in airbags for a few kilometers! Wow.

Last edited by MTI; 01-03-2004 at 02:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2004, 01:46 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
MTI, given the truth of your analysis, what are the chances of a safe launch, landing, return launch, return landing of human beings?

If it's 1/3 chance for one-way robots would it be 1/9 for round-trip? I'll bet not. I'll bet the chance of a successful return trip would be much, much lower. The return vehicle must remain viable after decceleration, near-crash landing, then be able to properly re-ignite for the return leg.

There are many people who find the current shuttle failure rate unacceptible. If we improved the failure from the current martian success rate for each leg to say... the shuttle rate (2% catastrophic failure) for a round trip, would it be okay to send manned vessels?

Botnst
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2004, 02:15 PM
MTI's Avatar
MTI MTI is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 10,626
As a believer in "the right stuff" a manned landing would have higher rates of success than robotic, but the challenge there is the scale/payload size necessary for manned missions with life support and safety systems. Unmanned vehicles are smaller, have less redundant systems and are, by naturel, expendable. So, for "bang for the buck" unmanned is the way to go for now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2004, 08:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 229
The Martian International Public Radio System today announced that the glow in the sky was a weather balloon NOT an unidentified flying object as rumored by the local citizens. All has been reported quiet in the sky in Martian Area 51. Good Luck NASA.
__________________
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-03-2004, 11:55 PM
Botnst's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There castle.
Posts: 44,587
BBC says safe landing

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3365371.stm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2004, 01:06 AM
sfloriII's Avatar
Still pedaling...
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,614
Quote:
Originally posted by MTI
... exiting the gravitational pull of Earth, traversing space,
Excuse my anal tendency here. I doesn't actually exit the gravitational pull of the Earth as gravity really has no boundaries. I only remember that fact because my astononmy teacher waaay back in school said that Walter Cronkite said a similar statement on the air as he talked over televised shots of our guys taking off for the moon.
__________________

Current:
2014 VW Tiguan SEL 4Motion 43,000 miles.

2016 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport (wife's).

Past:
2006 Jetta TDI 135,970 miles. Sold Nov. '13.
1995 E-320 Special Edition. 220,200 miles. Sold Sept. '07.
1987 190-E 16 valve. 153,000 miles. Sold Feb. '06.
1980 300-D 225,000 miles. Donated to the National Kidney Foundation.
1980 240-D manual, 297,500 miles. Totaled by inattentive driver.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2004, 01:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: oregon
Posts: 2,013
Spock! Are you napping........


William Rogers........
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2004, 08:09 AM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 14,921
Wonder if it has any vacuum controls - pun intended.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2004, 12:01 PM
mikemover's Avatar
All-seeing, all-knowing.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 5,514
Damn, I can't find my foil hat!

Mike
__________________
_____
1979 300 SD
350,000 miles
_____
1982 300D-gone---sold to a buddy
_____
1985 300TD
270,000 miles
_____
1994 E320
not my favorite, but the wife wanted it

www.myspace.com/mikemover
www.myspace.com/openskystudio
www.myspace.com/speedxband
www.myspace.com/openskyseparators
www.myspace.com/doubledrivemusic
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-2004, 11:01 PM
jhal's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Brooksville Fl
Posts: 226
Just caught it on the news, it made it!!! Congrats NASA!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2026 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page