|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Hotter Thermostat for
I just installed a new thermostat in my ’92 201(4 cyl. 102 engine).
The reason I replaced it is that since the ambient temps around here have been getting lower (in the 40 degree F range) the car has been running at about 78 degrees C – too low. The only thermostat available at FastLane was rated for 87 degrees, so that’s what I got. With the new thermostat, it now runs at about 82 degrees – still too low in my humble opinion. I’d like the engine to run at about 90 degrees. Is there another engine in the MB family that runs the same physical thermostat, but rated for something higher – maybe 92 degrees? Thanks in advance. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Go 90-100% antifreeze.
Beck Arnley makes a 195 (90C) degree thermostat. By the way why do you think 82 degrees is too low? |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
The cooling fan's electric clutch engages at well over 100 degrees. This tells me that MB engineers fealt it was fine to run the engine much hotter than 87 degrees. My guess is that the 87 degree thermostat is a safe compromise from the standpoint of MB. They have to spec a thermostat that will keep the car from overheating if it's sold/operated in the South (say Texas or Arizona) with the A/C running full blast. Well I'm in Maine, I don't need that kind of protection. (and my A/C doesn't even work anymore) Maybe someone with more knowledge will chime in here, but my guess is that the ideal temperature range for this engine (max power and efficiency) is somewhere in the low 90s. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I cant help you much, but I do know that antifreeze turns to jello when it is in 100% solution, below (I THINK) 0* F, that cant be good...
I wouldnt go more then 75 antifreeze, and 25 water (distilled only) ~Nate |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Why not get that? Believing what your temp gauge tells you is pretty silly. After you put in a new thermostat and the temp gauge doesn't read the thermostat spec, replace your temp gauge.
__________________
Kent Christensen Albuquerque '07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550. '01 Porsche Boxster Two BMW motorcycles |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
i have heard
that winter fuel gets poorer economy. also in my case i leave it running more so it is warm when i come out. are you planning to change it back in the summer?
i think i wouldnt put in a warmer stat. but prob one is available. i would also as noted above check the accuracy of your guage. tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Running a mixure other than 50/50 is a bad idea... out of the question. I would change it back in the summer if it was running hot. But my guess would be that it would not run hot... but that's just a hypothisis. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Would you consider leaving the thermostat as is, and get a hot girlfriend instead ?
__________________
2007 C 230 Sport. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I have the opposite problem.
The dealer replaced my leaking water pump, flushed my cooling system, replaced the thermostat, refilled with all MB stuff, and now my car runs at about 92 instead of 87 or a little less. That is just past half way between 80 and 100, instead of just under half way between 80 and 100. Actually, at the end of my last thermostat’s life, my car was running low 80s. I liked the idea of running just under 90 instead of just over 90. I don’t think hotter is a good thing. I was thinking about trying to get a lower temperature thermostat. I asked the dealer about it and they said only one 87-degree thermostat was available for my car. I gave up on it, but I still wish it were 87 instead of 92.
On these forums, some have commented that it is not uncommon for a failing thermostat to start leaking and allow lower operating temperatures. That may sound too bad, but I would not have been happy if a failing thermostat finally stopped working correctly and let my car overheat.
__________________
I just couldn't give up on my 1995 E320. I think it might be like always going back to that same bad relationship with an ex girlfriend. You feel you love them too much, or you are just too stupid to know any better. Flickr slideshow of my 1995 E320 http://www.flickr.com/photos/24145497@N06/sets/72157616572140057/ |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Excessive heat IS a bad thing. But if your car is designed to run at 92, you aren't doing it any favors by running it at 82. True, it's running cooler, which is good for longevity, but you're causing it to operate less efficently, therefore making it work harder (bad for longevity). Just to clarify: I'm not trying to make my engine run hotter than it's designed to run. I simply want it to run at the proper temperature. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
(BTW, I would only buy MB parts from them if it was something I could NOT get from FastLane or Phil -- gotta support the folks who support the community. And in this case, the MercedesShop forum IS the community.) But the best that Rock Auto could do is a 195 degree F stat. That's only 90.5 degrees C. It's better, but still a little low. Jeff Pierce
__________________
Jeff Pierce Current Vehicles: '92 Mercedes 190E/2.3 (247K miles/my daily driver) '93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon (263K miles/a family truckster with spunk) '99 Kawasaki Concours Gravely 8120 Previous Vehicles: '85 Jeep CJ-7 w/ Fisher plow (226K miles)'93 Volvo 940 Turbo Wagon '53 Willys-Overland Pickup '85 Honda 750F Interceptor '93 Nissan Quest '89 Toyota Camry Wagon '89 Dodge Raider '81 Honda CB 750F Super Sport '88 Toyota Celica '95 Toyota Tacoma '74 Honda CB 550F |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
how to increase radiator heat
How about that ol time fix: put a peice of cardboard in front of radiator, cut to fit temp you want ! good luck, Abe G
|
Bookmarks |
|
|