![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
egr comments
1982 300sd ,
asking for input on the pros and cons on disabling the egr valve. have had conflicting answers locally. live in calif. if that matters. any voice would be appreciated. thanks in advance, gary |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I doubt there is emission testing for your diesel there, find out before doing anything. I have a safety only here and it's $12.50 only.
If there is no sniffer for it (which I suspect), pretty much everyone bypasses the EGR as it creates some problems. Boost leaking, lots of junk into the intake manifold as well as the backside of the valves, and poor performance. Also, check around in the diesel section for lots more info. There is a GP about to go down on an EGR bypass kit.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look. ![]() '85 300SD 245k '87 300SDL 251k '90 300SEL 326k Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford. Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Despite the hoards suggesting otherwise I'd leave the EGR in tact. It does serve a useful and beneficial purpose. Besides making the air more breatheable
![]() I'm sure I've got a flame war coming but until someone proves they have a diesel that can run less than 14 secs in the 1/4 mile I will maintain a position that there is no good reason to take a slow car and make it pollute ![]() ![]() It's the irresponsibe attitude that "emissions equip. is the bane of all horsepower and must be done away with " that is gonna get the sport of hot rodding legislated out of existance. ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|