![]() |
how to measure piston protrusion?
Does anyone have specific info on measuring piston protrusion?
I'm trying to figure out if a 603.971 has a rod problem. The #1 piston seems to sit at an angle relative to the other pistons. The piston protrudes seemingly normally on the intake side but much less so the exhaust side. Should I set a level across the piston and measure protrusion at several points? If so should all points be within the single spec? Which way does a 3.5 rod typically bend when it collapses? Does any protrusion less than spec indicate a bent rod? Thanks, Sixto 93 300SD |
not sure about the protrusion, but if you have a bent rod, it will be obvious- use any other one, typically #2 or 3 dont bend so crank it around with one of those up, it should stick out slightly higher then the deck. your bent one will be noticibly below deck level.
|
1 Attachment(s)
This should help ... 0.74MM would be the min spec & as shown measure at both front & back
|
are those values the same for a 603? unless I'm reading it wrong, that document excludes that model.
|
only exclusion is for the 602.98_ engines..that is correct for all other 601/602/603 engines. They just worded it badly.
|
on second look, i see what you mean.
|
I don't have a dial gauge but I have the 603.971 beside a 603.961 and the protrusion of the 603.961 leaves no doubt. Consequently it's clear that the #1 rod of the 603.971 is bent forward. Dang! That's some sweet torque I'll be giving up :(
Thanks, Sixto 93 300SD |
what do you mean? you going to put it back together without that piston?
just kidding. but really, what do you mean? tom w |
I mean putting a rev happy 3.0 block in place of the torquey 3.5 block.
Sixto 93 300SD |
aha!
good idea! tom w |
If the bores and pistons were good in the 3.5,
You could destroke the engine with the 3.0 liter crank and rods. Then you'd have a 3.3 liter. But, I'm guessing if you've got a bent rod, then the block would need sleeving and new pistons($$$$). On a good note, the 3.5 liters heads are the later style. IE more crack resistent than the oringinal 3.0l. Michael |
Not so easy because neither the 3.0 rods nor 3.5 rods would work in that hybrid.
Sixto 93 300SD |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website