PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/index.php)
-   Tech Help (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Synthetic Oil/6000mi Vs. 3000mi/Regular Oil Changes? (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=182686)

Strife 03-18-2007 02:48 PM

Synthetic Oil/6000mi Vs. 3000mi/Regular Oil Changes?
 
Which of the above would be better in the long run?

Note: 3000 mi syn oil changes are not an option, unless you can find it for me as inexpensively as regular oil.

I change my oil myself so labor costs are not a factor.

t walgamuth 03-18-2007 03:12 PM

i would do the synthetic at 5 or 6k.

unless i had a car that was using some oil.

tom w

Jackd 03-18-2007 04:16 PM

I'd rather have my engine running on fresh mineral engine oil than on dirty synthetic oil.
I've used mineral oil in my Benz since I bought it (1991), changed oil at 5K and the car still purrs like a kitten at 400K+

Hatterasguy 03-18-2007 04:22 PM

It doesn't matter.

RLGDiesel 03-18-2007 05:05 PM

Jackd, I noticed you were in Canada...do you mean 5K kilometers or miles?

Jackd 03-18-2007 09:01 PM

5,000 km

mpolli 03-19-2007 12:30 PM

On one hand I agree with all above comments. On the other hand there are a couple other factors to consider I think. First, I believe the main advantage of synthetic oil is not in extending change intervals but in gaining the technical advantages it provides, specifically in the areas of resistance to thermal breakdown at high temp, and superior flowability at low temps. Tom W makes a good point about not using synthetic if the car uses oil but he doesn't say why. One reason is that synthetic resists oxidizing so much that it will not burn completely. So it goes through the engine unburned and will clog up your O2 sensor. I discovered this in my Toyota the hard way. What drove this home was when I spilled some oil on my gravel driveway. I got my propane torch to burn it off. At first it burned a bit, but there was a portion of it left behind that would not burn no matter how long I left the flame on it.

And there are other issues I learned about when I did a used oil analysis at Blackstone Labs. That is interesting to do at least once if you are interested in such things which it seems you are. So in conclusion, I would (and do) feel much better having high quality oil for 6K or even 10K miles, over lower quality oil for even 3K miles.

Now let us never speak of oil again...

Mike

Roncallo 03-19-2007 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strife (Post 1454181)
Which of the above would be better in the long run?

Note: 3000 mi syn oil changes are not an option, unless you can find it for me as inexpensively as regular oil.

I change my oil myself so labor costs are not a factor.

I do it twice a year which for me ends up being 8000 miles with Mobil 1.

My Taurus I had since new using this proceedure ran 230,000 miles engine still running like the day I bought it. It burt oil when I got it new and burt just as much when I traded it in.

My F150, 160,000 miles never burnt a drop of oil in its life. Because I use it less some changes I perform at about 4000 miles some times I only change it once a year.

My 1988 560SL, treated for the past 32,000 miles with Mobil 1 at twice a year 8000 miles per change. Current milage 133,000 no oil burn 15.073 sec in the 1/4 mile.

John Roncallo

manny 03-19-2007 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpolli (Post 1454999)
Now let us never speak of oil again...
Mike

Sure.
There is a Santa Klaus and an Easterbunny as well !:D

mpolli 03-19-2007 08:24 PM

Yes, Santa is running dino oil and the bunny is running Delvac (I think), but he changes it pretty often, and he ALWAYS uses a fleece filter. Rabbit fleece I think.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website