Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 08-12-2009, 02:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The slums of Beverly Hills
Posts: 8,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by brewtoo View Post
Just curious. How do you know how much gas to put in?
I use this chart. Scroll down.
http://www.duracool.com/Duracool/faqs.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
There is no retrofitting possible from 134a to either 744 or 1234, so I suspect that we'll be hearing a lot more about hydrocarbon retrofits for 134a systems in the not-too-distant future.
Hydrocarbon refrigerant in a R134 system is fantastic. Even colder than the old R12 systems when they were new. You haven't lived life until you see frost shooting out the vents on a 103f day in Seattle.

I can't wait for the day when R134 is just as illegal as R12 when they discover its bad for the penguins or the monkeys or whatever.


Last edited by tjts1; 08-12-2009 at 02:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-12-2009, 03:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
134a will go away eventually, of that you can be sure. The GWP of 1500 is pretty severe (1lb of 134a has the same GWP as 3/4 ton of CO2).

When it becomes hard to source, and if the laws don't change in the meanwhile, I will probably convert to HC refrigerants also. But right now, 134a works and at $3/lb, it's hard to beat the price with any HC refrigerant.

But a handful of states have specifically banned HCs for MVACs. Be sure that you know your local laws. Perhaps pressure can be put on them to reverse these bans when the time comes.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,338
Animal testing has indicated that with repeated exposure:
Benign testicular tumors may develop


From the Duracool website. This is from exposure to R134a (no amounts/length of exposure mentioned). Just an observation. I have no opinion of the use of any refrigerant. It just struck me as odd. I don't know about you guys but anything growing on my "boys" is definitely not considered "benign".
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:26 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
So, I guess this means that if you snort R134a you can get bigger balls. Maybe some of the politicians should try it. Oh... I forgot, not all of those slimy folks have them to start with.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D View Post
Animal testing has indicated that with repeated exposure:
Benign testicular tumors may develop


From the Duracool website. This is from exposure to R134a (no amounts/length of exposure mentioned). Just an observation. I have no opinion of the use of any refrigerant. It just struck me as odd. I don't know about you guys but anything growing on my "boys" is definitely not considered "benign".
That's an old but good myth. But is it true? I've only see it referenced where people are trying to sell me HC's that cost three times as much.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-14-2009, 11:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
That's an old but good myth. But is it true? I've only see it referenced where people are trying to sell me HC's that cost three times as much.

I don't think you'd call that a "myth". If it has testicles shouldn't it be called a "mythster"?

Yeah, yeah, I know, "Bad Mike, back into the garage and don't come out until you behave in public".
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08-14-2009, 12:27 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROTFLMAO!
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08-15-2009, 05:21 PM
EricSilver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 1,322
Glad I saw this thread after recharging with R134, otherwise I'd probably be hunting for the Duracool.
__________________
2008 E350 4matic / Black/Anthracite

------------------------------------
Gone but not Forgotten:
2001 E430 4matic, 206,xxx miles, Black/Charcoal
1995 E320, 252,xxx miles, Black/Grey
1989 260E, 223,00 miles, Black/Black
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 08-16-2009, 02:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oregon, Illinois (about 100 miles due west of Chicago)
Posts: 354
My 89 300 se had been converted to r134a before I bought it and it worked well until a trip to St.Louis during one of their famous heat waves, then it could barely cool the interior.

I was planning to switch to evirosafe, which I've used in the past and have been very pleased with; however, I read a number of references, including some on the forum, saying good old hardward store propane made a great refrigerant.

I just had to try it. I made an adapter out of two old propane torches, an old yellow charging hose and a clamp. I looked up the amount of r12 my car originally had, 1300 grams, and from reading various references, decided a correct charge of propane would about 30% or 390 grams. I picked up a small bottle of propane fuel, (on sale at my local Ace, for $2.99), and it turned out to contain 400 grams of propane, which is just a tad over 30%. I pulled a vacuum, then charged in the entire 400 grams.

We haven't had any temps hotter than about 88 since I did it, a month or so, but it does work very well, keeping me nice and cool, and a recharge can be had at any hardward store in America for less than 5 bucks.
__________________
2000 Mercedes S500
1990 Mercedes 560SEL
1970 Triumph Spitfire
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 08-16-2009, 05:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
I am planning to convert my vehicle, a Lexus LS400 to Propane as well. I am posting here because this seems to be a civilized discussion. I had some rude responses in a Lexusforum just for sharing my thoughts....
People were wishing me a firey death and an explosion.

So, the idea to use straight hardware store propane is cool, i love to experiment!

I already ordered 5kg each of R290 and R600a, to go for a blend of 50/50 in order to keep pressures down. I would have not ordered the gases if i had read this thread beforehand....

Ok, another thing i wanted to let you guys know is that you can mix R134a into your R12 system, here is my story:

I am living in China at the moment, when i first arrived i was intensively looking for a used SL500 or simmilar, i wanted a save and powerfull ride, traffic is terrible here.
I failed finding a reasonable Benz, the thing i came across is that 1990 Lexus LS400, what can i say i love this car.... i never drove a Jap before.

I bought it one year ago, last year the AC delivered ice cold air at max summer temperatures and humidity.
It gets hot and 100% humit here, crazy....

So this year i had to replace the compressor discharge hose and refilled the system with R12.
So far so good, the only thing i noticed was that the aircon did not blow as cold as before.
Low side and high side pressures were all within specs, strange.

Then i remembered that the previous owner told me his shop topped off the system with 134a..... back then i thought: what the hack is he talking about.

Out of frustration i started to do some research and ohoooooo, found this Article:

Quote:
Posted by George Goble on June 19, 1999 at 21:14:44:
In Reply to: Re: Replacement of R12 with R406a posted by John Strauss on June 16, 1999 at 16:07:09:
As you stated, the EPA has now made it "illegal" to mix
different refrigerants in cars.. Last time I looked, it was
still legal to mix 'em in stationary equipment.
R-406A in various mixtures with R-12 were run in a fleet of Humvees
early on (ambulance bodies).. R-406A by itself gives a 6-8F colder
duct temps than R-12, so with 50/50 R-12/R-406A the performance
gain was about 3-4F or 1/2 of using pure R-406A. (before EPA mixing
ban).
The "shocker" in illegal mixing is that mixing Freeze12, FR-12,
or just R-134a with R-12 (computer simulation on what happens)
start out with one slowly leaking R-12 system, gets down to about
50% remaining charge when the owner decides a recharge is needed.
1) Assume owner just "tops off" with R-134a (system has mineral
oil that R-134a will not "carry", but 50% R-12 remains, so oil
return to the compressor works fine. R-134a and R-12 form an
"azeotrope" with a boiling point of around -31F (R12 is -21.7F,
(R-134a is -14.7F, Freeze12 is around -8F) at 1 ATM. This
results in a performance improvment (capacity increase 25% or so)
along with slightly higher head pressures.. Performance gain
(over R-12) is about 2/3 of the gain of using 100% R-406A.
Freeze12 (80% 134a/20% 142b) is similar, except 2-3F warmer
than the above.. still much better than total R-12. This
"good performaning" mixture is called "contamination" by those
with vested interests in preventing it.
2) Next summer, system low again, user tops it off with R-134a,
now there is 25% R-12 (still enough to carry oil fine) and
cooling is still better than R-134a.
3) 3rd summer.. system low again.. tops off again with R-134a,
12.5% R-12 remaining.. still returns mineral oil fine.. cooling
now is about R-12 performance..
4) 4th summer...system low again.. tops off again with R-134a..
about 6% R-12 left, marginal mineral return, but probably
will work.. R-134a cooling performance..
5) 5th summmer.. top off again.. 3% R-12 left.. oil fails to return
compressor siezes up and fails.. IF using Freeze12 instead,
performance will be about +15F warmer than R-406A (autofrost)
Look how well this "illegal contaminated system" worked.
Now if legal...
1) remove all R-12.. charge with R-134a or Freeze12..
and dont change the oil to POE.. (still is mineral).
performance: lower, 134a vs R-12..maybe 10F warmer..
If R-134a in mineral oil, compressor will fail within
1 week (or may go a couple of years if oil was changed to POE).
Freeze12 in mineral oil may run 3-4 months before compressor
gets "dry" enough to fail.
Doing things EPA legal is a "bad deal" when doing a "proper"
conversion to R-134a or Freeze12.. Illegal topping off gets much
better performance and 5 years of runtime...
go figure..
--ghg, inventor of R-406A (autofrost) and R-414A (GHG-X4)
Soooo, i recovered about one can of R12, dropped in one can of R134a and guess what, the system is back to live.
ICCCCCCE cold.

The compressor is still fine, even though the system was running with that mixture for years and there was absolutely no residue in the hoses and pipes.

I tought this might be interesting for anybody having a R12 system with low refrigerant level.
The only problem i see is that the R134a might cause corrosion, i read somewhere that this might be an issue.
But again, on my LS it did not cause any problem so far.

You cannot top of your 134a system with R12, the PAG oil would deteriorate in contact with R12!


I have to replace some O-rings soon and will then switch to the Propane mix.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 08-16-2009, 06:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
very comprehensive information about hydrocarbon (propane) refrigerants can be found here: http://www.hychill.com.au/
Check out their 56 page pdf fact sheet: http://www.hychill.com.au/tech/en_man.htm

in australia a huge amount of vehicles, especially taxis, are converted to propane refrigerants because r134a simply does not coooooooooool.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 08-16-2009, 02:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by roedel View Post
Ok, another thing i wanted to let you guys know is that you can mix R134a into your R12 system, here is my story:
Mixing 134a with R12 will work as long as there is enough R12 to carry the oil, but it is illegal in the US. Probably a bunch of other places too.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 08-16-2009, 06:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
That's an old but good myth. But is it true? I've only see it referenced where people are trying to sell me HC's that cost three times as much.
here some interesting health facts regarding R134a, see also attached document. I had to upload the document as a text file.
the .pdf version is to big.

Quote:
> LETHAL R-134a CONCENTRATIONS IN PASSENGER COMPARTMENTS MAY OCCUR
> FROM EVAPORATOR FAILURE
>
> In August 1997, a study was done at the Armstrong laboratory, Wright
> Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH. The report, "Human Inhalation of
> Halon 1301, HFC-134a and HFC-227ea for Collection of Pharmacokinetic
> Data" was authored by A. Vinegar, R. Cook, J McCafferty, M. Caracci, and
> G. Jepson.
>
> The concentration of R-134a being used was extremely low and (then
> thought) that nothing bad was going to happen. To quote from the bottom
> of page 10 (page 11 if abstract prepended), "Subject #3 was the first
> volunteer exposed to
>
> HFC-134a. The exposure concentration was 4000 ppm (0.4% v/v) and was
> scheduled to last for 30 minutes with a 5 minute postexposure evaluation
> period as was accomplished in the Halon 1301 portion of the study.
> Approximately 4.5 minutes into the exposure, the subject lost
> consciousness and both pulse and blood pressure dropped to zero."
>
> The test was aborted and medical personnel intervened and revived the
> subject.
> Suppose it wasnt a test in a medical lab, that person would be "dead".
>
> The industry, has in general, tried to "coverup" this "problem", often
> reporting "Human Subject Faints During Botched Air Force R-134a
> Inhalation test". They then go on to theorize that the nurse wiggled the
> blood drawing needle and that made the subject "faint". See (on the web)
> www.autofrost.com/humanhal2.pdf to download your own copy or call Monroe
> Air Tech at 1-800-424-3836 for a copy. Be your own judge. Using "0.4%"
> (4000 ppm) parts per million of R-134a vapor in air as the "lethal"
> amount, the following calculations were performed on several late model
> cars. They assume a bad evaporator leak or rupture, allowing the factory
> listed charge amount
>
> to escape into the passenger compartment. R-134a is heavier than air, so
> if the air is not "stirred" by a fan, heavier concentrations will be
> found in low spots and lower in high spots. For these purposes, we will
> assume the air is stirred and the concentration is uniform.
Attached Files
File Type: txt 134a health risk.txt (34.4 KB, 165 views)
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-17-2009, 11:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt L View Post
Mixing 134a with R12 will work as long as there is enough R12 to carry the oil, but it is illegal in the US. Probably a bunch of other places too.
It'll work if you have the correct oil in there. Common PAG will break down in the presence of R-12. So topping up a system that has been converted to R-134a with R-12 is risky. You need double endcapped PAG to survive in the presence of R-12. Or one of the universal synthetic oils that works with both R-12 and R-134a.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-18-2009, 08:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: brisbane,Qld.Australia
Posts: 2,067
I dispute the fact that Australian taxi's are using propane ( LPgas here)but they probably are as corruption is a way of life here.
Several million cars per year are sold with propane/butane mix in the air con.
R134a is due to be banned.
But for some facts.
propane only burns when it is pure. Add a fridge gas such as remnant 134a or R12 and it will not burn.
It will create it's own oxygen when it does burn creating a cycle of burning and oxidizing.Fireman the world over have been taught this.

Have any of you experts ever burnt R12?
What is the gas given off?
It's phosgene ,it's green and it kills you.
I have had a whiff of pure phosgene,hence the fact i have half of one lung missing.
The effect is instaneous and literally takes your breath away.
If you are in car accident and there is fire the burning R12 will kill you,leaving your corpse to burn .

But the Question I am asking is "How on earth are you guys getting Freon"? ,it has been banned for at least 15 years and the US was supposed to be leading the way. The Chinese have been condemned for making the stuff outside of international agreements.
I have been using LP gas for at least 18 years in all sorts of Fridge plants with zero problems .

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page