Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2009, 08:59 PM
stevenstevensteven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 200
Retarding Ignition Timing (to improve emissions?)

Reviewing the archives and found this excellent post from ann old thread on retarding timing... to improve emissions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke2.6 View Post
...

I don't know where the R16/1 resistor is located on your model. Maybe someone with a 126 can help out. Remove the resistor and replace it with a home made shorting plug - like a short piece of 12-gage wire with the exposed ends folded over so they make good contact with the pin receptables.

On my car there is a short piece of rubber tubing that connects from the manifold port to the nylon line that routes to the EZL module. This can be replaced with a piece of 1/8" vacuum hose with a slug of silicone sealer that is allowed to set up.

With these temporary mods, the car will feel VERY sluggish at low revs, but the retarded timing will considerably increase EGT, which will help keep the converter hot. The substitute parts can be removed and replaced with the OE parts when you are done with the test. Once you know the drill it only take of couple of minutes to configure and de-configure for emission testing.

Duke
I'm a little unclear on replacing the vacuum hose. Is this just for EGR equipped vehicles, as my '89 M103 is NOT EGR equipped. If it applies to non-EGR vehicles, I'd appreciate it if someone can help me isolate this hose as I'm not certain which hose Duke is referring to here.

Also, do I need to check the timing BEFORE I retard it? What is the ignition timing spec on these cars?

Thanks again.

__________________
Steven
1989 260E (276K miles)
1995 E320 (50K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2009, 11:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW / Collin County Texas
Posts: 1,882
Yes, retarding (like to 2 degrees or hey, even zero while you're at it) makes a huge difference and lowers emissions considerably. But you'll have difficulty driving to the testing center!!!
__________________
08 W251 R350
97 W210 E320
91 W124 300E
86 W126 560SEL
85 W126 380SE Silver
85 W126 380SE Cranberry
79 W123 250
78 W123 280E
75 W114 280
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2009, 12:36 AM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Curious if the only thing added to the '90+ cars was JUST the EGR for lower emissions or if the cam and such was changed.
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:48 AM
Cal Learner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Marysville, CA
Posts: 781
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevenstevensteven View Post
I'm a little unclear on replacing the vacuum hose. Is this just for EGR equipped vehicles, as my '89 M103 is NOT EGR equipped. If it applies to non-EGR vehicles, I'd appreciate it if someone can help me isolate this hose as I'm not certain which hose Duke is referring to here.

Also, do I need to check the timing BEFORE I retard it? What is the ignition timing spec on these cars?

Thanks again.
No, it's not just for EGR-equipped vehicles. The vac hose described in the post by Duke2.6 is pictured in the photo below. Leading edge of intake.
Attached Thumbnails
Retarding Ignition Timing (to improve emissions?)-p5095541xs.jpg  
__________________
1988 California version 260E (W124)
Anthracite Grey/Palomino
Owned since new and still going strong and smooth
MBCA member

Past Mercedes-Benz:
1986 190E Baby Benz
1967 230 Inherited from mom when she downsized
1959 220S Introduced me to the joys of keepin' 'em goin'

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world--those who understand binary and those who don't
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2009, 07:49 AM
Cal Learner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Marysville, CA
Posts: 781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hit Man X View Post
Curious if the only thing added to the '90+ cars was JUST the EGR for lower emissions or if the cam and such was changed.
Cam was changed and air (smog) pump also added.
__________________
1988 California version 260E (W124)
Anthracite Grey/Palomino
Owned since new and still going strong and smooth
MBCA member

Past Mercedes-Benz:
1986 190E Baby Benz
1967 230 Inherited from mom when she downsized
1959 220S Introduced me to the joys of keepin' 'em goin'

There are only 10 kinds of people in the world--those who understand binary and those who don't
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2009, 11:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 106
If this is just to get past the emissions testing, I'd go for it. I wouldn't leave it that way all the time, unless you want poorer fuel economy. I've had to do this for years with my old Jeep to get past the "smog nazis". I retard the timing about 4-6 degrees, lean out the idle mixture (it's carbureted...won't work with F.I. unless you can control idle mixture) and put a BB in the vacuum line going to the vacuum advance on the distributor, and readjust the idle speed. You can also create a temporary small, non visible (to the smog tech.) vacuum leak to further reduce CO and HC emissions. If your state checks for NOX emissions, this won't work very well, as the NOX will increase. Some Benzes don't have vacuum advance (like mine), just vacuum retard. Others have both advance and retard. If yours just has retard, you don't have to plug the line. So far, I haven't had to do anything to my old Benz to pass, knock on wood.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-02-2009, 01:56 PM
stevenstevensteven's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal Learner View Post
No, it's not just for EGR-equipped vehicles. The vac hose described in the post by Duke2.6 is pictured in the photo below. Leading edge of intake.
Thanks very much for the pic...is that your vehicle? If so, boy is your engine clean! I'm jealous!

So, this vacuum hose controls ignition timing advance... so blocking it keeps the engine from advancing. And shorting the resistor retards the timing? So, I'm retarding my timing and keeping it from advancing. Is that correct?
__________________
Steven
1989 260E (276K miles)
1995 E320 (50K miles)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-2009, 08:32 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal Learner View Post
Cam was changed and air (smog) pump also added.


Yeah the air pump I know of (mine fell off mysteriously), figured they went to a diff cam profile that doesn't self EGR like the '89 and older did. Now I know.

Now I wonder if the '90+ have a hotter cam profile (somewhat) and just used the EGR to drop the NOx lower than the '89 and earlier.

__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page