Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-14-2009, 05:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 26
diy motor mounts

I was wandering about what is the size and thickness of the board i will need to raise my engine to lift it and change my motor mounts?
I have a floor jack but dont want to hurt my oil pan.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-14-2009, 06:00 PM
Chad300tdt's Avatar
Benzless Scoutmaster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Wales, PA
Posts: 4,001
I used two 2x4's cut a couple inches longer than the oil pan is wide. A 4x4 would work better if you have one.

__________________
Chad
2006 Nissan Pathfinder LE
1998 Acura 3.0 CL
OBK#44
"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)

SOLD
1985 300TD - Red Dragon
1986 300SDL - Coda
1991 - 300TE
1995 - E320
1985 300CD - Gladys
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-14-2009, 06:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 26
Ok so one single 4x4 will ddo the trick.
thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-14-2009, 08:17 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
I use a single piece of 2x4....or a thinner piece of hardwood.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-14-2009, 10:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 760
Would that be okay for an E420? I'm wondering if the added weight of a V-8 would test the structural envelope of the oil pan. Has anyone done the mounts on a 119.975 using wood and a floor jack?
__________________
1993 400E, 256,000 miles (totaled)
1994 E420, 200,000+ miles
1995 E420, 201,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2009, 09:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 26
i cant tell very well by that picture if the board goes across towards the bumper or from door to door.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-15-2009, 09:59 PM
Chad300tdt's Avatar
Benzless Scoutmaster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Wales, PA
Posts: 4,001
It's going from door to door.

I put the front of the car on jack stands and removed the front wheels to give me room to get to the mounts comfortably. I replaced the engine shocks and oil cooler lines at the same time.
__________________
Chad
2006 Nissan Pathfinder LE
1998 Acura 3.0 CL
OBK#44
"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)

SOLD
1985 300TD - Red Dragon
1986 300SDL - Coda
1991 - 300TE
1995 - E320
1985 300CD - Gladys
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-15-2009, 10:09 PM
Chad300tdt's Avatar
Benzless Scoutmaster
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Wales, PA
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by emerydc8 View Post
Would that be okay for an E420? I'm wondering if the added weight of a V-8 would test the structural envelope of the oil pan. Has anyone done the mounts on a 119.975 using wood and a floor jack?
The OM617 weighs 563 pounds. How much does the M119 weigh?
__________________
Chad
2006 Nissan Pathfinder LE
1998 Acura 3.0 CL
OBK#44
"Pleasure in the job puts perfection in the work." - Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)

SOLD
1985 300TD - Red Dragon
1986 300SDL - Coda
1991 - 300TE
1995 - E320
1985 300CD - Gladys
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2009, 07:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 760
Googled it for an hour to no avail. I suspect it's at least a few hundred pounds heavier than the OM617, but haven't been able to verify that.
__________________
1993 400E, 256,000 miles (totaled)
1994 E420, 200,000+ miles
1995 E420, 201,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2009, 04:09 PM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by survivor View Post
I was wandering about what is the size and thickness of the board i will need to raise my engine to lift it and change my motor mounts?
I have a floor jack but dont want to hurt my oil pan.
The wood-under-the-pan thing is a MBZ method which is right in their maintenace library. So if no one knows about your particular engine, have a look there. My guess is that the V-8s can be lifted this way as well. Also keep in mind that you're not lifting the entire weight of the engine when doing this.
__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-16-2009, 11:23 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by emerydc8 View Post
Googled it for an hour to no avail. I suspect it's at least a few hundred pounds heavier than the OM617, but haven't been able to verify that.
I highly doubt the M119 is much heavier than a 617....which is an entirely iron block/head diesel....very heavy for its size. The M119 has an aluminum head right? The engine probably weighs around the same or perhaps even less than a 617.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-16-2009, 11:56 PM
mramay's Avatar
Mike R.
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 152
The M117 is 452 pounds and I'd expect the M119 to be less than 50 pounds heavier.

I use an 18" wide 2x6 on the pan to lift the engine. That pan is very thick steel, probably twice the thickness of my Chevy steel oil pans, and it will easily lift the engine (and if you forget to get everything loose, most of the front end weight of the car without distorting at all.
__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
FrankenBenz: '87 560SEC with an '02 cammed LS6 and custom 4L60E.
Bling: '87 560SEC, ported/polished, lowered
Lisa: '87 560SEL, lowered
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-17-2009, 02:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 760
Quote:
That pan is very thick steel, probably twice the thickness of my Chevy steel oil pans
Thanks. I actually deformed the oil pan on my 92 Chevrolet Z-28 by using the wood/floor jack technique to change motor mounts, so that's what made me ask the question.

I can't find the site now, but I recall reading that Porsche had to beef up the suspension and chasis of the 500E (which has virtually the same M119 engine as my E420) to accomodate the increase weight over the 300E engine. I thought I remembered reading that it was a few hundred pounds heavier than the 6 cylinder in the 300E.
__________________
1993 400E, 256,000 miles (totaled)
1994 E420, 200,000+ miles
1995 E420, 201,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-17-2009, 10:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,358
As much as I hate recommending HF there's THIS for a cheap price.

http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=96524

$60 versus a collapsed oil pan, teeter-tottering boards on a floor jack, smashed fingers,...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-17-2009, 01:05 PM
280EZRider's Avatar
No Dumping
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Oregon Valley
Posts: 1,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D View Post
As much as I hate recommending HF there's THIS for a cheap price.

http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=96524

$60 versus a collapsed oil pan, teeter-tottering boards on a floor jack, smashed fingers,...
I can understand why you hate recommending this thing, especially when a wide block of wood would do an even better job in view of the fact that the wood would support the majotity of the pan. The gimmic, on the other hand, appears to support just a small thin area.

Chad300tdt has the right idea about the wood support. A single 2x4 can flex too easily.

__________________

Don't Chrome them; polish them
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page