![]() |
Is it wrong to err higher on ATF, Brake Fluid Spec/Grade?
Is it wrong to err higher on ATF, Brake Fluid Spec/Grade?
If I use, say ATF Dexron Mercon III on an 87 300D vice ATF regular, am I headed for damage or a transmission rebuild? Likewise, I rebuilt my whole 87 300D brake system. I used DOT 4 vice DOT 3. I know you shouldnt take Fluid specs lightly. I once ruined a 240D transmission (manual) by using Gear Oil vice ATF Any advice? Is it wrong to err higher on ATF, Brake Fluid Spec/Grade? http://mywebpages.comcast.net/snow7ice/BENZ.html __________________ 1983 240D 240K owner rebuilt engine |
My understanding is that Mercon/Dextron III supercedes Mercon/Dextron II standards, so the new stuff could only be better.
This is assuming your tranny calls for Mercon/Dextron II, of course. Besides, I do not think they sell "II" anymore. On the brake fluid, I always upgrade to DOT4, and have never had a problem. The boiling point is higher, and the moisture absorbtion potential is lower. Some owner's manuals continue to insist upon DOT 3. Could be a reason for this, but I am not aware of any. Avoid DOT5, since that is a whole other matter, and not compatible. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website