Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46  
Old 01-29-2013, 09:35 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D View Post
Not quite. Vacuum measured at right below the throttle bottle will be a bit less than what is measured further down the plenum. Compare it to a funnel. Pressure is highest at the narrowest part of the neck and less at the widest part.
Mike, with throttle plate closed, there is no flow through throttle body, therefore no change in pressure. All air flow at idle goes through aav & idle valve directly into manifold.

__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-29-2013, 11:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
I believe that the vacuum rise (by 3 or 4 ") ..when I pull the vacuum line of the distributor....is through the change in ignition timing (from 3 ATDC to 9 BTDC) along with raised idle speed. I can pull the distributor vacuum and close the open vacuum line and see if it makes a difference... I doubt it.

Martin
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:05 AM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by werminghausen View Post
I believe that the vacuum rise (by 3 or 4 ") ..when I pull the vacuum line of the distributor....is through the change in ignition timing (from 3 ATDC to 9 BTDC) along with raised idle speed. I can pull the distributor vacuum and close the open vacuum line and see if it makes a difference... I doubt it.

Martin
Martin,
You are right. I never thought of that. You can set timing like that. Rotate distributor to advance timing until you get best vacuum, then just back of slightly. I tried that once and it seemed to get timing about right. I have an article about that somewhere.

Graham
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
Martin,
You are right. I never thought of that. You can set timing like that. Rotate distributor to advance timing until you get best vacuum, then just back of slightly. I tried that once and it seemed to get timing about right. I have an article about that somewhere.

Graham
Hi Graham
That is correct. I tried both methods (I mean according the MB manual...set 6 ATDC) and the vacuum method... they are in a close range...would be great if you could send the article... I learned to back off 1-2 degrees at distributor after setting best vacuum at idle (w/o vacuum connection at distr.) then install vacuum line to distr.
With this method I ended up at 3 ATDC (instead of 6 ATDC according manual)I believe the late timing for the US version (6ATDC) is just for the exhaust data..in fact not so great.

Another thought on the fuel pressure....as my pressure is absolutely stable no matter the driving conditions...If flow would be questionable...perssure would back off slightly making the injectors inject less fuel. But since the pressure is so stable I don't think that there is any issue.

I'll increase pressure slightly and then look at AFR numbers again...
If AFR is going down towards rich... then I'll try the spare MPS on my shelf.

Last thought on mixing air with bung at the current exhaust position:
I have looked at the end of the exhaust pipes (where I have the bung welded): per exhaust there are 2 pipes, an inner and an outer pipe...why is that?
Could it be that the cavity between the 2 pipes is drawing air in (by some Venturi effect?) For what reason did MB do this? Can it be that the exhaust gases get deluded with air in order to show better numbers. Do European cars have the same double tube wall?

My thought was to close the void between outer and inner tube at the end and then see if AFR numbers change for the better.
Martin

Last edited by werminghausen; 01-30-2013 at 02:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-30-2013, 06:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,358
You're right Graham. I forgot which system we were discussing.
__________________
“Whatever story you're telling, it will be more interesting if, at the end you add, "and then everything burst into flames.”
― Brian P. Cleary, You Oughta Know By Now
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 01-30-2013, 06:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,358
Martin, quit "chasing your tail" and move the sensor.
__________________
“Whatever story you're telling, it will be more interesting if, at the end you add, "and then everything burst into flames.”
― Brian P. Cleary, You Oughta Know By Now
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-30-2013, 07:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D View Post
Martin, quit "chasing your tail" and move the sensor.
You might be right...I'll need to cut the bung out and weld to a better spot.
Just lazy
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-30-2013, 10:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
What concerns me most of all is the unstable idle and this weird powerless of this 3.5 engine. Could this be failing trigger points? or gunk in the distributor point?
What else causes these symptoms together with the too high AFR?

I am really puzzled...
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-30-2013, 12:34 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by werminghausen View Post
What concerns me most of all is the unstable idle and this weird powerless of this 3.5 engine. Could this be failing trigger points? or gunk in the distributor point?
What else causes these symptoms together with the too high AFR?

I am really puzzled...
Martin,
On my SL, there is no double pipe at exhaust - Is it just that you have separate tailpipes that fit over the muffler outlet pipe? Any any event, moving is best bet.

Regarding unstable idle and lack of power. You should make sure teh trigger points are free of oil. (They never burn, so don't use any abrasive to clean. I sprayed with a degreaser and ran a piece of paper or thin card back and forth. The ingnition points are another possibility. Maybe dwell meter is inaccurate? I would just set at 0.014" for a start. Dwell then is usually about right.

Have you tried setting ECU knob in centre of range and watching if AFR varies as you adjust it? You say idle is bad, but not if you have tried adjusting idle AFR with ECU knob.
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 01-30-2013, 01:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by werminghausen View Post
You might be right...I'll need to cut the bung out and weld to a better spot.
Just lazy
I removed the old bung and start putting it more upstream. Here are pictures.
Do you approve the new location? I am still not willing to remove the exhaust.. I fear if I do lots of old rust will come down..I spare removal until the time comes. I think I can weld with exhaust in place.
However this ****ty drill is dead after one hole in the exhaust...need to find a way to get this hole open.
Any comments?
Attached Thumbnails
manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2754-1.jpg   manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2755-1.jpg   manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2756-1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 01-30-2013, 04:40 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by werminghausen View Post
I removed the old bung and start putting it more upstream. Here are pictures.
Do you approve the new location? I am still not willing to remove the exhaust.. I fear if I do lots of old rust will come down..I spare removal until the time comes. I think I can weld with exhaust in place.
However this ****ty drill is dead after one hole in the exhaust...need to find a way to get this hole open.
Any comments?
Different car than mine, so I am not sure where that is. But anywhere further back should be a help.

Good Luck with it. Once you get the sensor relocated, do the test at idle using the ECU screw. It would confirm you have mixture control at idle.

Car is packed and we are hitting the road first thing tomorrow. Limited email access for a few days.
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 01-30-2013, 05:11 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by werminghausen View Post
I removed the old bung and start putting it more upstream. Here are pictures.
Do you approve the new location? I am still not willing to remove the exhaust.. I fear if I do lots of old rust will come down..I spare removal until the time comes. I think I can weld with exhaust in place.
However this ****ty drill is dead after one hole in the exhaust...need to find a way to get this hole open.
Any comments?
Looks much better, you should have no air mixing in down there!

I have a Dewalt 18v drill. The 10+ year old battery lasted ~5m if I was lucky. I took it apart & found out the cell size. I then ordered replacements from eBay & soldered them together to rebuild it myself. Cost was $25 IIRC, and now it lasts a LOT longer under MUCH heavier use before needing a recharge!
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 01-30-2013, 10:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham View Post
Different car than mine, so I am not sure where that is. But anywhere further back should be a help.

Good Luck with it. Once you get the sensor relocated, do the test at idle using the ECU screw. It would confirm you have mixture control at idle.

Car is packed and we are hitting the road first thing tomorrow. Limited email access for a few days.
I have a 1971 300SEL 3.5. Do you think there are different models?
I will do the testing with Idle control screw as you suggest and report back.
Safe travels and thanks so much for all your help.
I am still puzzled about the unusual behavior of this engine.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 01-31-2013, 02:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Update: I welded the 'new bung'. Seems to be a much better spot.
I started the engine.. engine is backfiring a lot, well I don't have the cold start injector installed.
The vacuum is jumping with every backfire.
However the AFR is reading much better with around 14- 14.5 now...engine not quite hot. some pics of old and new spot.

I'll prepare now the following: I'll try and clean the trigger points as well as
ignition point...then do another road test, followed by the ECU idle adjustment.
What do you think is the reason for backfire and unstable idle ?
Attached Thumbnails
manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2758-1.jpg   manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2757-1.jpg   manual how to adjust the 3.5 engine (ignition and A/F ratio)-pict2760-1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 01-31-2013, 03:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,410
Good news..
guess what I found: I opened up the valve cover on the left side (cylinders 5-8) and checked the oiler rail...as I had bought the wrong size plastic parts (bought 10mm instead of 8mm plastic for fuel rails). So I installed the old ones...grrr for the time being..need to change as soon as I get the right parts...
I was hearing a lot of mechanical noises from the left side. I thought maybe I am toasting the cam bearings when the rails slipped off. But this was not the case fortunately...But what I found when I checked the fire order of cylinders...I must have confused 7 and 8... (firing order was the 15476382 instead of 15486372) so this was the reason for the weird performance and backfire...unstable idle? 7 and 8 are 270 degrees apart...
What exactly are the symptoms of this wrong firing order?
I need to work now but will catch up later.


Last edited by werminghausen; 01-31-2013 at 05:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page