View Single Post
  #15  
Old 11-06-2006, 05:26 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Tomguy Tomguy is online now
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjlipps View Post
Man, apparently my rule of thumb for compression values is based on flawed logic. I know the method for calculating compression ratio based on volumetric measurements would point to a direct relationship between engine compression and atmospheric pressure but apparently real-world measurements don't bear this out. I guess the main thing is that the values are near what the mfr. says they should be and aren't too far apart from each other. In other words, we still have a problem with the center two cylinders here.
My gauge agrees with your numbers. I was expecting my heads to give me a 9.2:1 compression ratio but apparently I have 10.0:1 - I got 146PSI on my #6 cyl (the only one I measured) after swapping to hotter heads. Either they may have higher compression or the gauges are off (or both?)
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2024 CR-V Hybrid

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2018 Durango R/T, 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote