View Single Post
  #44  
Old 11-07-2006, 11:44 AM
retmil46's Avatar
retmil46 retmil46 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
back in the '60's one of my older sisters was dating a submariner when I was thinking about joining the USN. He pushed for subs by saying, "Two kinds of vessels in the Navy, submarines and targets."

On a previous subject, I think there is at least one surface combatant ship, not a carrier, that is a nuke. Not sure it's designation.

Found it: CGN. CG is a cruiser, "N" is nuke.

CGN-9 Long Beach
CGN-25 Bainbridge
CGN-35 Truxtun
CGN-36 California
CGN-38 Virginia

Example descriptor:

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/cgn-36.htm
There was also the South Carolina (sister ship to 36), and Mississippi, Texas, Arkansas (Virginia class).

I say WAS, because if I'm not mistaken, all of them were put in mothballs back in the 90's during the drawdown. I remember one of the newest, Texas, was decommed around '95 or so. Even the newest would be pushing 25 to 30 years old now anyway, due for retirement.

Basically, they got replaced by the new gas turbine jobs, Ticonderoga CG-47 class, Aegis air defense ships. CGN's were built along more traditional lines = harder to upgrade and overhaul. Gas turbine jobs were built to be modular, just swap out modules to upgrade equipment, lot less time in the yards.

Also there was the expense of the power plant. For a carrier where you could easily expect a 50 year service life, and not having to carry bunker fuel meant that much more aviation fuel on board, makes sense.
__________________
Just say "NO" to Ethanol - Drive Diesel

Mitchell Oates
Mooresville, NC
'87 300D 212K miles
'87 300D 151K miles - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Jeep Liberty CRD 67K miles
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club
Reply With Quote