
12-12-2006, 12:52 AM
|
 |
Rondissimo
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Coast
Posts: 162
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
ahhhh yes, but if we had done that would you have a benz to drive? that is any better than a kia?
tom w
|
I may not have made this clear enough ... 'cherish' was meant zynical ...a few quotations from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgenthau_Plan
Office of Strategic Services ( OSS):
On December 11, OSS operative William Donovan sent Roosevelt a telegraph message from Bern, warning him of the consequences that the knowledge of the Morgenthau plan had had on German resistance; by showing them that the enemy planned the enslavement of Germany it had welded together ordinary Germans and the regime; the Germans continue to fight because they are convinced that defeat will bring nothing but oppression and exploitation. [12] The message was a translation of a recent article in the Neue Zürcher Zeitung:
The conviction that Germany had nothing to expect from defeat but oppression and exploitation still prevails, and that accounts for the fact that the Germans continue to fight. It is not a question of a regime, but of the homeland itself, and to save that, every German is bound to obey the call, whether he be Nazi or member of the opposition.
On March 20, 1945 President Roosevelt was warned that the JCS 1067 was not workable: it would let the Germans "stew in their own juice". Roosevelt's response was "Let them have soup kitchens! Let their economy sink!". Asked if he wanted the German people to starve, he replied, "Why not?".[16]
On May 10, 1945 Truman signed the JCS 1067. Morgenthau told his staff that it was a big day for the Treasury, and that he hoped that "someone doesn't recognize it as the Morgenthau Plan."[17]
In 1947 the U.S. Congress warned that the continuation of the present policies:
…can only mean one of two things, (a) That a considerable part of the German population must be "liquidated" through diseases, malnutrition, and slow starvation for a period of years to come, with the resultant dangers to the rest of Europe from pestilence and the spread of plagues that know no boundaries; or (b) the continuation both of large occupying forces to hold down "unrest" and the affording of relief mainly drawn from the United States to prevent actual starvation.[20]
__________________
|