Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
Excuse my ignorance.
|
Your apology is accepted and you are forgiven.
The reference to the bloated amoral pig and to Billary were simply introductory material. They were intended, as it were, to prime the pump for what was to follow.
If you paid close attention, you would notice that I was expressing outrage that two people, whose morals are below those of a fecund ferret, would have the unmitigated gall to criticize AG Gonzales.
I was not making an argument on behalf of Conzales qualifications. That would be the subject of a different thread.
So please, pay attention and stay focused.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
I am sorry that I cannot match your sophistication on these issues.
|
Well, you are trying and you should get some points for at least trying. BTW, did you ever hear the one about sarcasm being the lowest form of humor? No, I guess not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
She was not up to the job,
|
Something that we can both agree on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
but she did what she thought was best....
|
For billy, et al.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
She was one of the least political AGs.
|
Are you serious????
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
Didn't her side win in court?
|
Oh, so that is the criteria then? Well, then tell carl about that, because he, and a few others, are all up in arms because two appellate justices ruled that Cuba, not the US, has sovereignty over Guantanamo and so the terrorists held there have no right to HC. Tell carl that a win by the Administration means that they were right and so to stop complaining.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dculkin
... I think it's just too far over my head. I'll keep trying.
|
Well, you keep trying and someday you may get it right. Don't give up....