View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-02-2007, 10:03 AM
RBYCC's Avatar
RBYCC RBYCC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by 300B View Post
I feel otherwise.

This board shows plenty of problems with W124 vs the W202.
If you already have your answer then why ask?
Problems with the W124 possibly because they have been around since 1986 versus 1996 for the W202?

I own a 1988 300CE purchased new in may of 1988.
The 300CE with 63K miles has recently had a period TurboTechnics twin turbo kit installed.
Also acquired a 1999 C43 AMG a few years ago with 26K miles.

Both excellent automobbiles, but I would stand behind the w124 as being better engineered and higher build quality.

Probably wouldn't own any Merc newer then a W202, as it still retains a "connection" with the W124 design elements.
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg
1971 280SL ROADSTER
1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES
Reply With Quote