View Single Post
  #11  
Old 11-27-2007, 09:37 PM
cmac2012's Avatar
cmac2012 cmac2012 is online now
Me, Myself, and I
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 36,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwampYankee View Post
I might be going out on a limb, but I think most recreational fisherman and hunters realize that you need to protect the very critters you wish to target as well as their habitat. That's why so many of us belong to organizations such as B.A.S.S., Ducks Unlimited, etc.

However there are cynics among our ranks, which I tend to agree with, that any government designated hatchery, fishery, nursery, < insert your favorite off-limits zone euphemism here> that has environmental groups' endorsement is just another incremental step towards the outright banning of hunting and fishing. It's one thing as an club/organization to work to maintain and improve the habitats and voluntarily place limits on takes in the interest of continuing their sport, it's another when government (local, state, federal), pressured by the environmental lobby, starts to impose them.

Unfortunately as recreational participants, our voices are no where near as loud and powerful as the commercial interests who are better able to dictate public policy and, arguably, more likely to cause long-term harm. That's why we'll be targeted first.
I dunno, I hear more and more about viro groups realizing that hunters and fishermen are their natural allies, especially compared to massive industrial interests.

You may have heard how some groups are endorsing high priced trophy hunting as a means to ensure employment for locals such that they have more stake in the survival of various species so as to lay more golden eggs.
__________________
Te futueo et caballum tuum

1986 300SDL, 362K
1984 300D, 138K
Reply With Quote