View Single Post
  #85  
Old 02-04-2008, 08:52 AM
RichC's Avatar
RichC RichC is offline
Internal Error 404
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 963
polemical = contriversial

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botnst View Post
None of those links are evidence that Exxon got away with anything. They do provide evidence of loss of wildlife and paid fines and for clean-up. Notice taht the references provided below are on point and not polemical.

Though I greave for the common loons, how is the common loon population doing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Northern_Diver

How much has Exxon paid in fines do to the disaster?
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2006/June/06_enrd_341.html
http://www.valdezalaska.org/history/oilSpill.html
http://www.jomiller.com/exxonvaldez/usatoday.html

B
--------------------
My references are completely on point.
The freeking picture is of an oil soaked bird caused by Exxon.
What you you want a bucket of oil laiden saltwater from the prince william area ?

And my references are not polemical, or contriversial.
They are facts put together by a leading autority on the disaster.

polemical = contriversial

Just because you use big words does not mean you know it all.

The habitat there is still screwd up.
Both of our references show that.
And is Exxon still paying anyting ?
No they are not.
In fact they spent millions in lawyer fees so they would not have to.

Are they getting away without have to pay.
Yes they did, and are still getting away with it right now.

Did they pay a small taudry, token amount.
Yes.

Did they pay enough to pay for the acutuall damages and cleanup.
No.

Think of the multi million dollar lawsuits that people have won over a spilled cup of hot coffee.

Then think of what Exxon has had to pay for the largest oil spill ever.
__________________

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace.
Jimi Hendrix
Reply With Quote