View Single Post
  #43  
Old 05-23-2008, 03:18 PM
rcounts's Avatar
rcounts rcounts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig View Post
That's the point, you do need to demonstrate that every batch BD meets fuel standards if you plan on selling it to anyone with a vehicle under warrantee without being sued (assuming the BD producers can convince the engine manufacturers to endorse it's use beyond B5). If the BD produces do not do that, they will always be marginal. If they ever get to the point where they can sell high quality fuel that is approved for new vehicles, they will become relevant. Until then, it's just a sideshow.
Sorry, in terms of testing we're talking about two different things. I'm talking about testing and "normalizing" the condition of the WVO prior to BD production - and how they control its effect on the end product. You're just talking about testing of the end product.

And sure, they have to test their end product for meeting standards, but so does every other fuel producer. When they are averaging the quality of their WVO feedstocks as I described, why would they have to test their end product for meeting standards any more than producers of dino-diesel? BD production is a very simple chemical reaction process (heck tons of people produce ASTM standard bio in their garages) and as long as the feedstocks and process don't change, the end product quality shouldn't vary any more than end products of distilling/cracking petroleum.

Am I somehow missing your point?
__________________
1984 300 Coupe TurboDiesel
Silver blue paint over navy blue interior
2nd owner & 2nd engine in an otherwise
99% original unmolested car
~210k miles on the clock

1986 Ford F250 4x4 Supercab
Charcoal & blue two tone paint over burgundy interior
Banks turbo, DRW, ZF-5 & SMF conversion
152k on the clock - actual mileage unknown
Reply With Quote