View Single Post
  #16  
Old 12-13-2008, 09:56 PM
::matthew's Avatar
::matthew ::matthew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 594
the article doesn't say that the profit is gross, net, a number he pulled out of a hat, or whatever else...It also doesn't mention what, if any health care expenses or maternity leave he pays.

but a net profit of 50K seems like a fairly low return on 35 trucks.

Government at all levels has heavily subsidized trucking for many years. 90% of damage to interstates and federal highways is due to commercial trucking; which is a cost that is paid by all taxpayers, not just those who benefit from the goods being transported. As government budgets get tighter and the true environmental costs of transport begin to get factored into the cost of products sold, I imagine we will see a lot less of the cheap plastic crap that comes in through long beach or whatever port and gets put on trucks.

People are going to be put out of business by increased environmental regulations and it's not always a bad thing at the macro level. Ron Faulkner might do fine with a dozen 2012 Volvos for his fleet...it's not like it's just him that's having to buy new trucks or have his current ones re-fitted. Maybe he’ll score some low cost financing from the government to help him come into compliance.
__________________
1985 300D cali 190K

http://mercedes.thatchermathias.com/mw300d.jpg
Reply With Quote