A proper compression test is conducted with the engine at operating temps 80-90C! So the test you performed and the numbers you'e posted are meaningless with regard to any specifications! But the range of specification meaningless numbers do point to a fact that there is relatively not that much deviation between the cylinders, and one can therefore assume that there is not likely a significant difference in the cumulative wear factors such as ring, piston wall condition and things like valve and valve seat wear.

As you obviously already posess the required equiptment you would be doing yourself a favor to conduct another survey of the compression under the correct conditions and then compare those results to the published specifications. That way you would actually know where this issue stands.