View Single Post
  #15  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:16 PM
awsrock's Avatar
awsrock awsrock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbomachines View Post
Now that its mentioned, I think I saw a commercial a few days ago for a tire that was supposed to save 1000 miles worth of gas over the lifetime of the tire (another "stretch" calculation if you ask me)...makes me wonder how well it actually performs, especially in wet and emergency conditions where the contact area/friction really matter.
Yeah, I've seen those too..I think Michelins?
I bought General Ultimax HPs, for numerous reasons, but one being that they had a very low rev/mile rating compared to other tires. I don't know if they are "officially" LRR, however. One thing I did notice, though, is that a lot of these fuel saver tires are not very good at doing anything else. Mine at least had good wet and snow ratings!

The width definately makes some difference. I think the lowest .cd for the w124 was achieved with like..185/15s or something crazy like that. I realize that isn't much different than 195s, but when you start getting into wide-rimmed 265 and whatnot, that must mess with the frontal area a bit.
__________________
Dan
2005 E320 CDI - 246k
1987 300SDL TD05-16g, Herlevi pump, Elbe manifold, 2.47 LSD - 213k
Past: 1987 300D - 264k
Reply With Quote