View Single Post
  #11  
Old 10-17-2009, 06:38 PM
sasquatchgeoff's Avatar
sasquatchgeoff sasquatchgeoff is offline
Cascade Foothill Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 561
Quote:
Originally Posted by babymog View Post
Actually, it was also the head. The '87 OM602 head was the same design and the '87 OM603 head, suffered from cracks into the water jacket just as the #14 OM603 head, and was upgraded to eliminate that known weakness. My '87 190D had to have the head replaced. The casting numbers and this problem are mentioned in the FSM, might check the casting number.

Also, I easily got mid-30s MPG on the highway at 75mph, and occasionally was able to break 40mpg on a slower trip (round-trip mileage averaging 60mph-ish on 2-lane highways and summer fuel). A wonderful car for fuel mileage if in good tune.
You are right - I was assuming that the head for the '87 602.961 was virtually the same as my '86 602.911 (NA) - which it wasn't, at least in the areas around #1 cyl water jacket and pre-chamber diameter. Had to review the FSM repair notes 01-0400.

X2 on the fuel mileage
__________________
327K on 1986 W201, 602.911, 722.414 2.5 190D ("The Red Baron")
139K on 1993 W124, 104.942, 722.433 2.8 300E ("Queen")

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4081/...0bb92d3c_m.jpg http://i370.photobucket.com/albums/o...g?t=1325284354

Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater.
- Albert Einstein

take a walk down memory lane...
Reply With Quote