View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-28-2010, 01:50 PM
Wayfarer's Avatar
Wayfarer Wayfarer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 112
Thanks for the responses. You guys have these cars and obviously know what you are talking about.

Based on what you're saying, I think a 92-93 400E is in my future. Economy is only 2 mpg worse, but it's a V8. I love my 280SE 4.5 and know the sinful pleasures of a Mercedes V8.

As for the differences between the 92 and 93, the 92 has a 10:1 compression ratio vs 11:1 for the 93. Is that it? So the 93 has more power, better economy, and a strict requirement for premium only gas.

Very interesting about the decline in quality in 94-95. Plastic oil tubes. Not just an urban myth then.
__________________
1972 280SE 4.5
1984 300SD, 250K
1991 300SE, 89K
1992 300D (330K miles when KIA'd by mother-in-law 8/10/09 - still sitting in my barn)
1994 E320, 109K
1995 E420, 60K
Proud Member of the Mercedes Benz Club of America - Idaho Chapter
Reply With Quote