View Single Post
  #45  
Old 04-04-2011, 12:02 PM
babymog's Avatar
babymog babymog is offline
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanyel View Post
I'm perplexed by the idea that a 104, especially HFM, would be hard to work on. What specifically? What ever breaks? If it has ASR sure it's a nightmare, but that's ASR not the motor itself. There's a good cure for that too, which is to get rid of the car. The HFM 104s and the LH 119s of the early/mid 90s are the best, longest lasting, most DIY friendly, repairable engines Mercedes ever made.
Agreed completely.

Many of these posts are coming from those who have not had at least a couple of examples of each for years of use, I have. The M103 is a fine engine, just that the M104 does everything better and with essentially the same bottom end, it is a very durable engine. The additional changes to the transmission and car body/interior/electricals are IMO the icing on the M104 cake.

On the other hand, if you're going to spend a bunch of money on your engine to equal or exceed the power of the M104, I guess the M103 sounds like it is very modifiable, ... however there are a couple of members here with turbo/blown M104s who have benefitted greatly from the additional valves and breathing available.

I spent a lot of time working on CIS and CIS-E cars starting in the mid-'70s when they came out, L-Jetronic also, and the HFM system of the M104. Personally I prefer the accuracy of a sequential-injection system over the constant injection system, and find it very reliable. I have and will choose the more modern sequential injection HFM system over CIS any time.

To each his own.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote