View Single Post
  #1  
Old 07-18-2011, 01:42 AM
JHZR2's Avatar
JHZR2 JHZR2 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by leathermang View Post
" Recommendations " are now influenced by the need to maximize corporate mpg stats... NOT for longevity.. they do not care... in fact will be pleased to have your MB wear out a little faster so you can buy another one from them...
Give me a break. Really?

Is that why trucking fleets run 15w-40 over SAE 40?

Fuel economy in those tests is ruled by the 100c oil viscosity. Guess what? A 5w-40, 15w-40 and SAE 40 are all the same viscosity at 100c.

It is far better to have adequate flow as fast as possible under any conditions.

And if you look at any UOA from any HDEO, youll see that it retains proper viscosity over a LONG time... It would be one thing if they weren't shear stable, but they are.

So what exactly do you think y ou're getting out of running a straight weight? 30 years ago there was bona fide benefit. Things have changed just a bit, and oils are more than a little but better now.
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (116k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
2008 ML320 CDI (199k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (267k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K), 1985 300D (233K), 1993 300D 2.5T (338k), 1993 300SD (291k)
Reply With Quote