Thread: Tuning with CIS
View Single Post
  #223  
Old 08-20-2011, 11:00 PM
RBYCC's Avatar
RBYCC RBYCC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsxr View Post
FYI... typical driveline loss is roughly 18% on a Mercedes with 722.3 transmission, give or take a percent or two, using stock wheels/tires on the chassis dyno. That means:

RWHP / 0.82 = crank HP (estimated)

Example: 261rwhp / 0.82 = 318hp at crank (estimated)


20% (or higher) loss estimates will result in artificially inflated crank HP numbers. If you want to be really conservative you can figure about 15% loss. Dunno what it might be with a manual trans, but maybe a percent or two less. (?)

Not totally true.......

Depends on the type of dyno that you're doing your pulls on...
18% is typical on an inertia type whereas 30% is common on a eddy current load type dyno.

Inertia type like a DynoJet tests your vehicle's ability to accelerate the drum of inertia, which is about 2500 pounds, and does not add aerodynamic load to the equation. It uses a simple formula to calculate how much horsepower it takes to propel a given weight to a certain speed. To get get torque, the rpm is used to "calculate" it, from the HP calculation.

The load type like a Mustang add the difference between the weight of the drum, and your actual vehicle weight, add aerodynamic load, AND, also use a strain gage to DIRECTLY measure the torque, not calculate it.

The load type gives a more accurate RWP reading then the inertia type and you can better tune on a load type.
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg
1971 280SL ROADSTER
1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES
Reply With Quote