Thread: Tuning with CIS
View Single Post
  #302  
Old 09-16-2011, 01:24 PM
RBYCC's Avatar
RBYCC RBYCC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DELAWARE
Posts: 1,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by 400Eric View Post
Been studying that page and cross referencing with some other material that I have.

Those EZL that offer 2 degrees less advance under no vacuum conditions (high load conditions) are for the 2.6 M103 (M103.940). It makes sense when you think about it. With about a 1/4 inch smaller bore, the 2.6 doesn't need as much ignition advance!

Ed, thanks again big time for the info and link!
Regards, Eric
Eric

I'm researching a bit more on the potential EZL differences.
Go to page RA15 ( fourth page ) of the below link...
Seems like there were ignition map changes made to cure some problems with manual transmission cars..

http://www.tglmarketinginc.com/mbforum/servman/MB%20Service%20Manuals/www.pauldrayton.com/uploadfiles/merc/Service/W124/w124CD1/Program/Engine/103/Tech_Mods/comb3.pdf

Ed
__________________
http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b1...c/GOWIDE-1.jpg
1971 280SL ROADSTER
1988 300CE TWIN TURBO WIDEBODY
1994 E320 CABRIOLET
1999 C43 AMG
2005 G55K AMG
2008 CLK63 AMG BLACK SERIES
Reply With Quote