Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryBible
I pointed this out a few posts ago, but for YOU I will do it again. I was clear in PREDICATING my response.
IF he saw it or knew for sure it happened, he should NOT have stopped until the perpetrator was stopped. Period. If the facts are that he did NOT know for sure, then that is something different.
|
And I was clear in agreeing with you -- albeit under discreet facts that we simply don't know.
Which has been and remains my entire point in this whole thread.
Most people are running off and ready to string him up...without knowing the facts.
And while we should be ever-vigilant and protective of children (no one disagrees on that point, right?), it is nevertheless very sad that so many people are ready to jump on that "crucify Paterno" bandwagon...without any actual knowledge of the facts.
Which is analogous to Iran immediately assuming the three hikers were American spies and basically kidnapping them for ransom. Is not our society better than that? Can't we at least let the facts develop?