Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road
Hmm.... I've read back through my responses, and can't find where I jumped to conclusions. Of course, since it's me, I'm not surprised that you did not pass up an opportunity for an unwarranted sarcastic insult.
Hope you enjoyed it.
|
Lets review shall we.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Air&Road
Maybe it would be best if you reserve judgment until a significant amount of information is gathered. The planes tail did NOT fall off, and it was NOT the fault of maintenance.
|
You said that we should reserve judgement until more facts are presented. Then in the next sentence you went on to state two things that you knew did not happen. You said the tail did not fall off and that it was not the fault of maintenance.
Are either of these to conclusions supported by any NTSB finding and if so can you please link them here.
You made two statements of fact without any supporting facts while telling other to wait for the facts before drawing any conclusions. This equals IRONY.
Your conclusions seem quite reasonable (as do other theories presented) but they are still theories that are unsupported by any facts on your part.
You cannot cry about being a victim (and get any sympathy) when you constantly shoot your self in the foot.