Quote:
Originally Posted by davidmash
Lets review shall we.
You said that we should reserve judgement until more facts are presented. Then in the next sentence you went on to state two things that you knew did not happen. You said the tail did not fall off and that it was not the fault of maintenance.
Are either of these to conclusions supported by any NTSB finding and if so can you please link them here.
You made two statements of fact without any supporting facts while telling other to wait for the facts before drawing any conclusions. This equals IRONY.
Your conclusions seem quite reasonable (as do other theories presented) but they are still theories that are unsupported by any facts on your part.
You cannot cry about being a victim (and get any sympathy) when you constantly shoot your self in the foot.
|
The facts I stated are very obvious to anyone who knows even a little bit about flying and has seen the video and the debris field. The NTSB knows it, but they can not say it until their process is complete. The data recorders backed this up. The OP obviously had no idea what he was talking about.
All you have to do is wait and the report will bear me out. Sorry to disappoint you, not being able to nail my ass like you want so badly to do.