Quote:
Originally Posted by ruchase
The scenario you describe bears very little resemblence to TM & GZ. Fact is TM was walking along casually when GZ spotted him and figured he looked "suspicious". Suspicious has a very different meaning for different folks.
We know from GZ's 911 call that he was under the impression that TM was up to no good; however, he had no factual basis to make that assertion. It was purely based on his instincts, which were clearly wrong. Had GZ been a real cop, he might've known he would've had to have probable cause to stop/question an individual; however, we know from the events that night that GZ indeed profiled TM, and concluded simply based on TM's physical appearance that he was a hoodlum.
Part of living in a free society is being able to walk without the fear of being harassed simply for how you look. Had someone actually witnessed TM do something illegal, then GZ (and any LEO) would have every reason to follow him and possbly search/arrest him.
|
according to the ONLY living witness to the event, GZ didnt stop TM and question him. GZ got out to identify on the dark rainy night the street he was on and TM ambushed him. Not against the law to think someone suspicious, not against the law to follow someone in your neighborhood that you dont recognize, and not even against the law to ask someone what they are doing in your limited access housing area. It is however, against the law, to assualt someone doing the preceding things